Jump to content

ImgBurn Support Forum uses cookies. Read the Privacy Policy for more info. To remove this message, please click the button to the right:    I accept the use of cookies

Photo

Can't erase BDRE XL disc (write protected)


Forum Rules

Read the Guides forum if you don't know how to do something. :readbook:
If you have a question or a problem, check the FAQ and use the Search to see if you can find the answer for yourself. :lightbulb:
If you're having trouble burning double layer media, read Here.
Still stuck? Create a new thread and describe your issue in detail.
Make sure you include a copy of the program's log in your post. No log = :chair:


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 pyronaut

pyronaut

    ISF Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 05 April 2018 - 05:23 AM

I just got a Sony BDRE XL 100GB disc and am trying to erase it to write onto it, but I'm getting an error that the disc is write protected. It's rewritable, so that doesn't make any sense. Below is the log output. Any ideas why this might be happening?

 

I 00:57:33 Initialising SPTI...
I 00:57:33 Searching for SCSI / ATAPI devices...
I 00:57:33 -> Drive 1 - Info: Slimtype BD  E  DS4E1S EA2B (D:) (SATA)
I 00:57:34 -> Drive 2 - Info: ASUS SBW-06D2X-U C701 (G:) (USB 2.0)
I 00:57:34 Found 1 BD-ROM/DVD±RW and 1 BD-RE XL!
I 00:58:12 Operation Started!
I 00:58:12 Device: [0:0:0] ASUS SBW-06D2X-U C701 (G:) (USB)
I 00:58:12 Media Type: BD-RE (Disc ID: SONY-ET2-002)
I 00:58:12 Media Supported Write Speeds: 6x
I 00:58:12 Quick Erase: No
I 00:58:12 Format Properly: Yes
I 00:58:12 Format Size: Preferred
I 00:58:12 Format With Full Certification: Yes
I 00:58:12 Format Without Spare Areas: Yes
I 00:58:12 Erasing Disc...
E 00:58:12 Failed to Erase Disc! - Reason: Write Protected
E 00:58:12 Operation Failed! - Duration: 00:00:00
 


#2 LIGHTNING UK!

LIGHTNING UK!

    Author of ImgBurn

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 29,552 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted 05 April 2018 - 06:42 AM

As it's only supposed to support BD-RE TL at 2x and yours is still claiming 6x for the supported write speeds, I'd have to say it has no firmware support for the 'SONY-ET2-002' MID.
Please don't PM me with questions that should be posted in the forum. I won't reply - Especially if you have post count of 0!!!

Replies to posts belong in the forum where everyone can read them. Please don't PM them.

In fact, don't PM me at all unless it's something I've asked to be told about!

Before asking questions, search the forum to see if someone else already has.

Use the FAQ and Guides forums to your advantage. I don't want to have to tell you to read them!

#3 dbminter

dbminter

    ISF God

  • Beta Team Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,835 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 April 2018 - 03:42 PM

Yeah, there's no 6x support for any rewritable BD media.  There is for BD-R.  So, your drive is returning wrong information for that media, and it's most likely as LUK said.  No support in the firmware.

 

 

Or it could be just typical Sony junk.  My first BD-RE SL was a Sony and it died before its fifth write.



#4 pyronaut

pyronaut

    ISF Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 06 April 2018 - 05:42 AM

Thanks for the tips guys. I went on Asus's site for the drive and there didn't seem to be any firmware updates available, so I emailed their support about the issue. Let's see if they can do anything about it. 



#5 dbminter

dbminter

    ISF God

  • Beta Team Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,835 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 April 2018 - 04:37 PM

Which ASUS drive?  Be warned that if it's the latest BD drive they put out, I thoroughly tested two units and discovered they actually destroy rewritable Verbatm BD-RE DL discs I fed them.  Also 8x Ritek DVD+RW  I sent the drives back because they're borked.  A firmware update in the future may fix this, but it's been about a year so far and there's no firmware update for it.



#6 pyronaut

pyronaut

    ISF Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 16 April 2018 - 12:19 AM

Which ASUS drive?  Be warned that if it's the latest BD drive they put out, I thoroughly tested two units and discovered they actually destroy rewritable Verbatm BD-RE DL discs I fed them.  Also 8x Ritek DVD+RW  I sent the drives back because they're borked.  A firmware update in the future may fix this, but it's been about a year so far and there's no firmware update for it.

 

It's the  ASUS SBW-06D2X-U drive. I bought it a couple years back, so I'm guessing it's not the latest one they've put out. 

 

I've been in touch with their support and they're trying to say that the drive doesn't support BDRE-XL, even though on the web site for the drive it says it supports BDXL and 100GB discs. In the list of discs they gave me that they support, BDRE-TL is there, and they don't seem to understand that it's the same as BDRE-XL (i.e. triple layer). 

Kinda frustrating when a company's support doesn't know what they're talking about. 



#7 dbminter

dbminter

    ISF God

  • Beta Team Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,835 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 April 2018 - 12:45 AM

Pioneer did a somewhat similarly silly thing with their tech support with me recently.  I told them their BD-209M and D series drives don't recognize Ritek 6x DVD-RW when inserted.  (Most drives don't, anyway.  Only LiteOn DVD and LG BD do.)  They forwarded me a PDF of all MID's their drive supports, because they said not all Ritek media were supported.  The PDF contained the MID of the discs they said it supports, but doesn't.  When I pointed this out to them, the best I got was they said they'd forward it to the engineers.

 

 

Now, it is possible that a BD drive might support BD-R XL/TL but not BD-RE XL/TL.  My first DVD+R drive was an HP that only supported DVD+R, not DVD+RW.  They said it would eventually support DVD+RW with a firmware update and then later finally had to admit they were lying because the drive laser was never designed to support DVD+RW!  :rolleyes:






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users