Jump to content

lobuxracer

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Georgia, USA

lobuxracer's Achievements

ISF Newbie

ISF Newbie (1/5)

  1. It seems to work correctly, but without testing all 10 map zones, it's hard to say if it works correctly or not. I can surely say it works in the region where I live, but that's all I can say with any certainty. It does find Starbucks a lot better than the previous version!
  2. As requested: TSSTcorp CD/DVDW SH-S182M SB06 (ATA) Current Profile: DVD-ROM Disc Information: Status: Complete State of Last Session: Complete Erasable: No Sessions: 1 Sectors: 4,027,872 Size: 8,249,081,856 bytes Time: 895:06:72 (MM:SS:FF) File System Information: Sectors: 4,027,872 Size: 8,249,081,856 bytes Time: 895:06:72 (MM:SS:FF) TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 4027871) -> LeadOut (LBA: 4027872) Track Information: Session 1... -> Track 01 (LTSA: 0, LTS: 4027872, LRA: 0) Physical Format Information (Last Recorded - L0): Book Type: DVD-ROM Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: 10.08Mbps Number of Layers: 2 Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP) Linear Density: 0.293 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 2,223,000 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 0 Physical Format Information (Last Recorded - L1): Book Type: DVD-ROM Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: 10.08Mbps Number of Layers: 2 Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP) Linear Density: 0.293 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 2,198,086 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 0 Layer Information: Layer 0 Sectors: 2,026,393 (50.31%) Layer 1 Sectors: 2,001,479 (49.69%)
  3. Newb to the site, but not a newb to forums - searched quite a bit and have not seen this particular issue. I've had complete success in the past with Lexus navigation discs, the Lexus Generation 5 hw/sw (also sold as Eclipse aftermarket) had a firmware version with an override feature I like to retain, so I've put together hybrid discs with early firmware and later maps a few times. I got a 10.1 disc, and used ImgBurn to create an ISO and MDS. In the past, all I've needed to do to validate the ISO works is burn a new disc by selecting the MDS and putting a new Verbatim DVD+R DL in my Samsung (TSSTcorp CD/DVDW SH-S182M SB06) burner. I persistently get a layer break error preventing me from writing anything to the disc. Optimal layer break position must be a multiple of 16 Optimal L0 sectors 2,026,393 Next largest acceptable value 2,026,400 Log looks like this: I 03:13:01 Operation Started! I 03:13:01 Source File: E:\Nav ISO\464210-1711.MDS I 03:13:01 Source File Sectors: 4,027,872 (MODE1/2048) I 03:13:01 Source File Size: 8,249,081,856 bytes I 03:13:01 Source File Volume Identifier: 464210-1711 I 03:13:01 Source File Application Identifier: Session Offset : 0 VTC Sector Offset: 0 I 03:13:01 Source File Implementation Identifier: Smart Storage, Inc. I 03:13:01 Source File File System(s): ISO9660, Joliet, UDF (1.02) I 03:13:01 Destination Device: [0:1:0] TSSTcorp CD/DVDW SH-S182M SB06 (Z:) (ATA) I 03:13:01 Destination Media Type: DVD+R DL (Disc ID: MKM-003-00) (Speeds: 4x, 6x, 8x) I 03:13:01 Destination Media Sectors: 4,173,824 I 03:13:01 Write Mode: DVD I 03:13:01 Write Type: DAO I 03:13:01 Write Speed: MAX I 03:13:01 Link Size: Auto I 03:13:01 Lock Volume: Yes I 03:13:01 Test Mode: No I 03:13:01 OPC: No I 03:13:01 BURN-Proof: Enabled I 03:13:01 Write Speed Successfully Set! - Effective: 11,080 KB/s (8x) I 03:13:01 Book Type Setting: DVD-ROM E 03:13:01 Optimal layer break position must be a multiple of 16. E 03:13:01 Optimal L0 Sectors: 2,026,393 E 03:13:01 Next Largest Acceptable Value: 2,026,400 E 03:15:14 Operation Failed! - Duration: 00:02:13 I 03:15:14 Average Write Rate: N/A - Maximum Write Rate: N/A I managed to burn one by manually setting the L0 break at 2,026,400 and I tested it briefly in the navigation unit. It appears to work. Is manually changing the layer break for what amounts to an exact copy expected? Am I doing something inherently wrong causing this problem, or is it possible Lexus is trying to make copying/archiving this data more difficult? I did try to change the write speed, but nothing seemed to make any difference until I manually set the layer break.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.