Pudah

I could swear I saw a post about this before but I can't seem to find it now. I have an old version of Easy CD Creator that I keep around because it has a handy CD Copier function. One specifies the source drive and the destination drive and clicks a button to copy a CD. It's a very useful function. Now that ImgBurn has a Read mode, has any thought been given to allowing the user to send the Read mode output direct to a second drive instead of to an ISO file? If ImgBurn could do this, I could then toss Easy CD Creator all together.

whoops, looks like I confused the Build settings tab with the General settings tab

This would be a handy feature. Other burning apps I've used set the volume label to YYMMDD_HHMM, though I'd personally prefer YYYYMMDD_HHMM. Perhaps somewhere in the Settings (there seems to be a good amount of room on the Build settings tab) you could ask the user for preferred format from a couple of choices and then use that whenever a volume label is not specified.

That took care of it. Thanks a ton for the speedy turn around and the great program!

LUK, I was able to see the 8:44 when I opened the image in IsoBuster and changed the time display options.

First of all, I luv the new version. The ability to create images is just the ticket. Great work LUK and team! Since I was very much looking forward to this new feature, I wanted to try it out right away. I tried specifying a particular date and time that I wanted on the folders in my build. However, the time that I specified (8:44) is not the time that ended up on the folders (9:44). Here is a screen shot of the folders when viewed in Explorer after having mounted the image with Daemon Tools: Am I doing something wrong, or could this be a small bug in the program?

I don't understand why all of the hostility toward a request to have ImgBurn burn from a folder of files as well as images. No, everybody doesn't need or even want it. But everybody doesn't need some of the other feature requests that I've seen mentioned on this forum. If nothing else, burning directly from the folder would save 5GB or 9GB or disk space (unless you are saying that the other programs that burn from folders do so by creating images behind the scenes). If it is a technical impossibility, fine. But I, for one, would love to have the ability to burn directly from a folder.