I don't see a gain here. If an ISO has to be built from scratch from a NAS or whatever storage it is, you still have to suck the required data down the pipeline at its regulated speed, regardless of what its origin is to be able to burn it to your chosen media. Given this irrefutable fact, why bother having the software buffer your ISO to a temp file and then burn it? It's quicker just to output your files to your burner - even if it complains about buffering problems. That's what BURNPROOF is for.
Hi,
I'd rather rely on a good piece of software than on the burnproof-functionality of a burning device.
For my understanding discs burnt that way (refocussiong the laser several times) are not of that quality the one's being burnt "at once" are.
I don't understand all that big deal - discussions around this feature (which is implemented in almost all other soft) but if it's really of that much effort I can understand why it's not being coded.
Maybe I'm too naively so that one of "the knowing" should explain it to me...
Cheers,
Jens.