Jump to content

dubplate selekta

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

dubplate selekta's Achievements

ISF Newbie

ISF Newbie (1/5)

  1. Interesting....When I want to mount an image I simply right click on the ISO, highlight Mount then click on the Virtual drive letter I wish to mount on. 2 clicks, and I run Windows - but not Daemon Tools. Do you use the MS CD/DVD Virtual drive control panel?-When you mount in this way is the volume label shown in the drive list in My Computer? Daemon Tools does not. blutach-> I have looked into the duplicators, info in their specs however, do not make it clear if the devices are capable of burning different images from 1 hard drive concurrently. scenario - 100 images 6 burners burner 1-image 009 burner 2-image 098 burner 3-image 077 Inaddition, id be interested if any of them facility a playlist type feature. A feature when i can enter a list of images needed to be burned unattended. scenario bill in special fx dept wants image -100 image -002 image- 013 tetron in graphic/costume design dept wants image-030 image-065 telvran in render department wants image-011 image-012 image-013 image-014 Best
  2. i do use shrink ppl, each image takes around 3 mins each. my point is 5 mins x 200 folders to ISO images = a frelling long time!!! nero...pfft, anyways i need to burn to 5 burners concurrently. With DVDD i make copies of the application and run multiple instances of it. Nero won't allow this!! don't discount my other major point. windowz makes it very tedious to mount ISO images in order to view them later in a dvd player app. daemon tools is a work around but it is a very kludged up system. other operating systems allow a user to just double click the image in the file system to have it mounted-to un mount clicking on the 'eject' button is all that is needed. daemon is a mpitfa with all the menu/sub menu clicking to mount then unmount. this is very tedious when working with many images. Why are so many ppl here so insistent i/we don't have a use for such a function and why are some trying so badly to disprove i/we find the ISO based system creates huge obstacles in our work flows? In no way has anyone requested this folder burning suggestion replace the ISO burning, we ask this in addition. I get the feeling the LUK is in-capable if even implementing this feature when taking all the ppl against this folder burning suggestion in to account.
  3. i need to be able to burn directly from a directory 'using the folders name as the volume label' that contains a VIDEO_TS folder. I have just spent the last 4 hours creating ISO's from directories which contain VIDEO_TS folders in order to actually burn them. I could save so much time doing other frelling stuff if this app could just burn from a folder. The use of ISO images posses another time consuming issue at the back end of my work flow. To play and view the video from the ISO's im forced to use the crappy deamon tools to mount the millions of images i have stored to preview in a dvdplayer like powerdvd. (maybe it would'nt peeve me as much if i could just assign deamon tools to mount an ISO image upon double clicking, in addition ISO creating names the file in total uppercase, so im forced to go reverse every file ISO name from full upper case to titlecase). Please LUK consider this!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.