Hurbida

Oh, don't get me wrong. It's a great program. It's just shy of incredible, and I think you know why. It's because you're unwilling set aside your personal opinions to change or implement things that would make the program even better. And I'm not just talking about this petty instance.

How about you design a good program without your added useless philosophies?

Okay, well if it's advanced, I suggest you remove the prompt altogether and make this an option that you can choose before you attempt to burn the DVD. The way I see it is, the prompt is meant for an advanced user, who may already know what it's for and why he/she needs it. The way it is presented is slightly educational. As it stands, an uninformed person cannot fully deduce why he/she would "sway from the norm" based on the information provided. By default, IMGBurn should simply perform the norm and burn the ISO to both layers. If an advanced user needs it to be on a single layer, he/she can go looking for the advanced option in the scary preferences or the ISO selection window. For more information, he/she could simply hover the cursor on top of that option and a mouse tooltip will further explain it. Easy. P.S. Thank you for taking the time to respond.

Hi, I have been wondering for a while now, why Imgburn asks you whether you would like to burn a small DVD iso to the first layer instead of both layers. It presents you with this long bit of text you must read and is just oh so helpful at explaining things. Is there any benefit to burning a DVD image meant for a single layer DVD to the first layer of a Dual Layer DVD? Does this increase write or read speeds? Does this do anything at all that would be beneficial? If not, why am I given the choice? Thanks,