SPA_CE Posted August 13, 2006 Posted August 13, 2006 I have the ElbyCDIO, Patin-Couffin, and SPTI driver. But my questions is, which one is better to use with ImgBurn?
volvofl10 Posted August 13, 2006 Posted August 13, 2006 by default, Ib uses SPTI which works well normally with XP and win2k. Unless your having problems, I'd leave it at SPTI
cornholio7 Posted August 13, 2006 Posted August 13, 2006 i would say almost all testing is done using spti
mooj Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 I have the ElbyCDIO, Patin-Couffin, and SPTI driver. But my questions is, which one is better to use with ImgBurn? Interesting replies, down below. My experience is different (but admittedly brief). I originally installed ImgBurn and selected the Patin-Couffin driver and things worked well. But then, thinking to reduce clutter, deleted the DVD burning application (CopyToDVD) that originally installed the Patin-Couffin driver; which removed it. Okay. I'm thinking; "Fine. SPTI is the default anyway"; and I just selected SPTI and go to burn another DVD... which Failed! So, lickety-split, I re-install CopyToDVD, reselect Patin-Couffin, and with the VERY SAME DVD THAT FAILED re-try the burn, and --voila-- no problems at all. Burned, verified, and plays just swell. This may not be THE definitive test, but it convinced me. I'll be sticking with the Patin-Couffin driver.
LIGHTNING UK! Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 That doesn't really prove anything and there's nothing to say a retry on SPTI wouldn't have worked. What's particularly strange is that you were able to re-use the disc in the first place - normally you can't if a burn fails. I've never used anything other than SPTI and so if there was a problem with it, it's safe to assume that would NOT be the case.
blutach Posted October 30, 2006 Posted October 30, 2006 I've used ASPI (even on XP machines - don't ask why) and SPTI, without incident. Regards
Recommended Posts