wjnjr

Yes it does. Thanks!

Thanks for the replies, but we still haven't quite addressed the original question. Perhaps it wasn't clear, so let me rephrase it: Strictly in terms of performance, with no concern for possible ill effects to the longevity of the hardware involved, Is there better speed, accuracy, reliability, and/or repeatability in the burning process if a SSD drive is used as the source instead of a conventional hard drive?

OK, so which drive is better to use as the source - defined as the location of the file(s) to be burned to the blank disk - in the burning operation? In this case the SSD is a Samsung PM830 m SATA SSD, attached to the motherboard and used as the (C:) drive running Windows 7 pro 64bit and all applications. It's plenty big, 220Gb, and performs constant read/write operations quickly and reliably. It is not a plug in USB drive. Maybe I didn't make that clear.

Thanks for the reply, interesting points. Actually, I'm wondering which drive would be better to use as the source for burning disks? The SSD because it's faster? (That's why I use it for the OS and all programs) Or the regular HDD because it is not involved in running Windows or ImgBrn and would only be sending data to the DVD burner with maybe less chance for errors?

My computer has two hard drives - a SSD (C:/) for the OS and programs (including ImgBrn) and a conventional 7200 rpm hard drive (D:/) for data storage. Which one would be best to use as the source for DVD and CD burns? Which one should ImgBrn be on? Or does it really matter?? Thx

I have a PLDS DVD+-RW DH-6ACS JD11 (ATAPI) that came with my Dell computer. What OEM brand tab should I use to set/change book type? I tried Lite-On and it did not work