Thanks for the Advice 'Lighting UK'
i just checked the CUE file, and everything is written there -
thanks, bye the way,
did you read these comments about ImgBurn in DVD tully list:
and what are your comment about messages below:
From: "David Powell" <david@imagitech.co.uk>
To: <dvdlist@dvdlist.tully.com>
Subject: [DVDList] DDP vs ISO+MD5
Reply-To: dvdlist@dvdlist.tully.com
I currently use Gear Pro ME 7 for creating DDPs for mastering of CD, DVD-Video and DVD-ROM. However GPME 7 does not work under Windows 7 and the upgrade to GPME 8 is pricey for what is to us essentially a compatibility update.
I then noticed that ImgBurn had the capabilty for creating MD5 checksum files with ISOs, which could make them as safe as DDPs.
So...
a) Is there any advantage of using DDP over ISO+MD5?
If you have used ISO+MD5 masters, how did it go?
Thanks,
David
@Robert Bock - Thanks, for your opinion. You're probably right, especially where double-layered and/or double-sided DVD-Videos are concerned.
@Niran Husing - Unfortunately I couldn't get GPME 7 to play ball with Window 7's XP Mode
Cheers,
David
It's not designed to create master for replication.
Apart this- it's the most reliable burning software:)
Andrew
> Against:
>
> - ImgBurn does not produce reliably a bit-for-bit copy of the original
> content (it does change the IFO and BUPs under unknown circumstances)
> - ImgBurn generates a "MDS", not MD5 file;
> - "ISO" images are not a standard;
> - DVD plants are not required to support such an image;
> - A plant who supports those may have to include extra steps to process
> your master; more steps = more opportunity for error.
>
> For:
>
> None that I can think of, in a professional environment.
@Yves Zimelman - ImgBurn does not produce MD5s by default, but you can them
turn on in the options.
@Andrew Kolakowski - I totally agree that ImgBurn is awesome for burning
discs, I use it for everything (including DVD-Video test discs) apart from
creating DDPs. I did ask LightningUK to consider adding DDP support to
ImgBurn, but he said that it didn't interest him, which is a shame.
But everyone's right I can't abandon DDP for pressed DVD-Video (as much as I'd
like to) due to CSS and layer breaks.
Regarding data discs, we've had a number of plants actively request ISO+MD5
masters over DDP. The reason for this appears to be that they like to run a
few basic checks with a burnt disc before it goes to glass, and they don't
have the facility to burn CDs/DVDs from a DDP.
Cheers,
David
From: Yves Zimelman <yvesz@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: [DVDList] DDP vs ISO+MD5
Reply-To: dvdlist@dvdlist.tully.com
At 18:41 14/7/2010, you wrote:
I beg to differ... it modifies the original IFO and BUP files in an
unpredictable way, and I've seen cases where the IFO and
corresponding BUP had very different sizes after ImgBurn copied the originals.