hn4n

my god,still no reply????????????

before i found this forum,i have also read a lot of articles to introduce how to use imgburn on the internet.they all say that imgburn can be used to make images for discs conveniently with all those 4 formats(iso format,bin+cue format,img format,and wav format).i guess it's because they found there are 4 choices of file extensions there when they try to make a image of a disc.i just can not understand,if imgburn can automatically choose the right file types of images for different kinds of discs,why u still provide us these 4 file etensions for choice, it's absolutely of no use at all but only confusing people? thank u,

why still nobody reply??? more explaination would make the truth more clear to more people,and therefore more people would like to choose to use the software.

well,your last post made me found out the great misunderstanding between i and u.i think the reason of the misunderstanding is my using experience of some other burning softwares,like ashampoo and nero.when i use nero to make a image of a disc,if i choose nrg/iso as the file extension,the nero would creat a image of the disc with nrg /iso format.and when i use ashampoo to make a image of a disc,if i choose bin+cue/iso as the file extension,the ashampoo would creat a image of the disc with bin+cue/iso format.however,it's not the case at imgburn.according to the defaut settings of imgburn,for multi tracks/sessions cds,no matter which file extension i choose,imgburn would creat the same image with bin+cue format even with different file extensions,and for all the other discs imgburn would creat the same image with iso format also even with different file extensions.you said that i could not really go wroung with that.it in fact means i could not go wroung with the real format of the image but only go wroung with the file extensions of the image files,right?in a word,file extension does not equal format at imgburn,while file extension equals format when i use ashampoo or nero to make a image of a disc.if so,why you show us so many different file extensions for choosing during the process of creating image file from a disc to make us misunderstand ? thank u,

do u mean it would also work fine for me to give my dvd image file the bin.extention,since imgburn software never stop me from doing that?????if so,why u told me in the past that i could not really go wroung with that?

do u mean the "img files" choice is of no use at all???u taught me that img file is just a file extension not really a format.but as i have heard before the img format is created by clonecd while nrg format is created by nero.futhermore,u said that i could not really go wroung with these file types.well,according to my using experience,imgburn only warns me from making image of a audio cd with iso format,but never stops me from making a image of a dvd disc with bin+cue format,also never stops me from making a image of a disc with img format.why? here is the log about how i creat a image of a dvd disc with bin+cue format successfully: I 16:50:39 ImgBurn Version 2.5.8.0 started! I 16:50:39 Microsoft Windows 7 Home Basic x64 Edition (6.1, Build 7601 : Service Pack 1) I 16:50:39 Total Physical Memory: 8,125,688 KiB - Available: 5,108,820 KiB W 16:50:39 Duplex Secure's SPTD driver can have a detrimental effect on drive performance. I 16:50:39 Initialising SPTI... I 16:50:39 Searching for SCSI / ATAPI devices... I 16:50:40 -> Drive 1 - Info: ATAPI iHAS524 B AL28 (G:) (ATA) I 16:50:40 Found 1 DVD±RW/RAM! I 16:51:03 Operation Started! I 16:51:03 Source Device: [0:0:0] ATAPI iHAS524 B AL28 (G:) (ATA) I 16:51:03 Source Media Type: DVD-R (Book Type: DVD-R) (Disc ID: CMC MAG. AM3) I 16:51:03 Source Media Supported Read Speeds: 2x, 4x, 6x, 8x, 12x, 16x I 16:51:03 Source Media Supported Write Speeds: 6x, 8x, 12x, 16x I 16:51:03 Source Media Sectors: 28,528 (Track Path: PTP) I 16:51:03 Source Media Size: 58,425,344 bytes I 16:51:03 Source Media Volume Identifier: Downloads I 16:51:03 Source Media Volume Set Identifier: 4383BF3600006F6D I 16:51:03 Source Media Application Identifier: IMGBURN V2.5.8.0 - THE ULTIMATE IMAGE BURNER! I 16:51:03 Source Media Implementation Identifier: ImgBurn I 16:51:03 Source Media File System(s): ISO9660, UDF (1.02) I 16:51:03 Read Speed (Data/Audio): MAX / 8x I 16:51:03 Destination File: F:\1\dfg.bin I 16:51:03 Destination Free Space: 273,118,912,512 Bytes (266,717,688.00 KiB) (260,466.49 MiB) (254.36 GiB) I 16:51:03 Destination File System: NTFS I 16:51:03 File Splitting: Auto I 16:51:04 Read Speed - Effective: 6.4x - 16x I 16:51:05 Reading Session 1 of 1... (1 Track, LBA: 0 - 28527) I 16:51:05 Reading Track 1 of 1... (MODE1/2048, LBA: 0 - 28527) I 16:51:14 Exporting Graph Data... I 16:51:14 Graph Data File: C:\Users\c\AppData\Roaming\ImgBurn\Graph Data Files\ATAPI_iHAS524_B_AL28_2013年12月4日_16-51_CMC_MAG._AM3.ibg I 16:51:14 Export Successfully Completed! I 16:51:14 Operation Successfully Completed! - Duration: 00:00:10 I 16:51:14 Average Read Rate: 5,705 KiB/s (4.2x) - Maximum Read Rate: 9,034 KiB/s (6.7x)

first of all, i have to appologize for starting so many new topics and acting like trying to take over the entire first page of the forum for advertising.but i do have a lot of questions for u ,as i want to make advertisements for your product to the people around me.i just feel confused about which file type should i choose to keep the image file with when i trying to make a image of a disc with imgburn.there are 4 choices listed :"bin files","img files","iso files" and "all files".and as i have heard the choice "iso file" is not suitable for all kinds of discs.how about the other 3 kinds of choices,are they all suitable for making images for all kinds of discs? thank u,

so u mean i can specify volume label abusolutly as my wish(if the name i specified were accepted by the computer),since it's just a name only,right?

today i tried to burn some files to a disc with imgburn.after i pressed the "build" botton to start the burning process,a new window came out to ask me choosing volume label.can u explain in more details what does volume label mean?and how should i specify the volume label? thank u,

i started the imgburn software and then pressed "creat image file from disc".at the layout of the read mode,i found there are 2 blanks at settings of read speed,can u explain in more details about the difference between these 2 balnks?and it's interesting that i can choose "max" only at the blank on the left side.

can u explain that in more details? thank u,

and i have also successfully made a image of a dvd disc with img format.

but i have just successfully made a image of dvd disc with bin+cue format.

do u mean i can not make a image of a dvd with bin+cue format??????

as i have heard in the past that iso format is not suitable for making images for all kinds of discs,for example,it's not suitable to make a image of a audio cd with iso format.how about the other 2 formats avaliable with imgburn(bin and img)?are these 2 formats(bin and img) suitable for making images for all kinds of discs? thank u,

as i have heard in the past that imgburn always closed/finalized discs when it burned.how about it now?does imgburn still always closes/finalizes when it burns? thank u,

thank u very much for your reply ,u are so kindhearted.

by the way,is it possible to write cd-da data to a blank dvd disc(like dvd+r, dvd-r,or dvd+r dl)?

but why other burning softwares like ashampoo and nero can verify written data after burning a image of a audio cd succesfully very often?

and can u explain in more details wether there is also drive offset when reading/writing data discs? thank u

according to what i have read from the admin's reply(http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?/topic/20476-audio-cd-verify/?hl=+cd&do=findComment&comment=142925) ,does it mean that verify cd-da data would fail in most of the conditions (if i enabled this function at options) since drives offset audio samples when reading/writing (what you write to a specific sector isn't what you'll get back when you read it)? thank u