Jump to content

ewedel

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ewedel

  1. Ok, thanks. Found the whole thing a bit disconcerting: two different "versions" of 2.5.8.0, with consistently different file sizes and checksums.  And although your 2016 post is indeed old, 2.5.8.0 ostensibly is older still, having released in 2013.

     

    Perhaps a 2.5.8.1 release would provoke the mirrors to update and generally help to clarify matters?

  2. There have been a number of forum posts regarding this, sorry to add one more.  But things really look like a bit of a mess right now.  Last night I tried downloading 2.5.8.0 from imgburn and two mirrors (softpedia and majorgeeks). As noted in

     

      http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?/topic/24647-download-from-imgburn-mirror-reported-infected-from-symantec/

     

    the file size from imgburn.com alone is different.  The file downloaded from imgburn is the only one to match the 2.5.8.0 checksums claimed by the imgburn site download info:

     

      MD5: 0B4C94F8480F8CD13E160BCEAAAA8B29
      SHA-1: 6FC013ED5944B13EFC54648699EA80F304E37AD0

     

    However!  This post (I believe from the imgburn author) in 2016

     

        http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?/topic/24395-md5-doesnt-match-any-downloadable-installers/?p=158913

     

    says these are the valid 2.5.8.0 checksums:

     

      MD5: 4BF2B8F4B46385BFDA4D65E423CFB868
      SHA-1: 6A3D20796E1FCD4169D5D339AF6E491DCEA3367C

     

    and in fact those are the checksums for the isos I downloaded from softpedia and majorgeeks.

     

    This is worrisome, and feels a bunch like the imgburn master download site has itself been compromised.

     

    Comments / clarification greatly appreciated!  [As is making the imgburn program in the first place, great software, thanks!]

     

    regards, Eric

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.