Why I still use Nero 2nd topic

[szabi]

Hi

 

Firsty, sorry for this new topic, but I was not allowed to reply to the original one.

Secondly I would like to say thanx for this excellent job you are doing.

 

I have only one reason I am still installing nero, this is the nero disc speed tool.

 

I always use the verify function after burning in imgburn.

But I can not get too much information about verification.

I get only these: completed, average and maximum reading rate.

 

It would be nice to know the started and minimum reading rate.

Or every other result of verify rate when it is worse than started one (with time stamp).

 

For example watch this picture:

 

It could give correct average and maximum rate even if something is not ok.

 

Might it be possibble to create a kinf of verify characteristic in log window?

I mean a simple one which could emphasize any break in curve.

 

Also I use access time checking in nero disc speed.

Might it also be possibble to get access time information if verification is used?

They are also important information whether disc is burnt correctly.

 

 

These would be my suggestion for further development.

 

Bye

szabi

[Cynthia]

You can already do this in ImgBurn.

 

Go to the download page of ImgBurn and install BurnPlot or the other supported programs and you can show the burn/verify data in a graph by just pressing a button in ImgBurn.

 

The access times, I would rather use a disc scanning to see the actual disc quality.

[eSkRo]

or you can just continue to use NERO....

[szabi]

You can already do this in ImgBurn.

 

Go to the download page of ImgBurn and install BurnPlot or the other supported programs and you can show the burn/verify data in a graph by just pressing a button in ImgBurn.

 

The access times, I would rather use a disc scanning to see the actual disc quality.

Thanx, this is the first time I hear about BurnPlot, it looks like almost good for me.

 

If disc is verified successfully by imgburn, I would not spend same time again to scan actual disc quality.

After verification, the access times are roughly enough to see any annoying differences on disc.

It would not take the verification much longer, that is why I suggest it might be included in it.

 

Anyway if these information - I wrote above - are available, it could be displayed in log window.

 

or you can just continue to use NERO....

Yeah, just my interest is to finish the usage of nero .

 

Bye

szabi

[Cynthia]

I doubt showing graph data in the text based log window is possible.

[szabi]

I doubt showing graph data in the text based log window is possible.

 

I mean a really simple way like this:

 

00:00:00 verify rate (08.0x) ....\
00:00:30 verify rate (08.3x) .....\
00:01:00 verify rate (08.5x) ......\
00:01:30 verify rate (08.7x) .......\
00:02:00 verify rate (09.0x) ........\
00:02:30 verify rate (09.2x) .........\
00:03:00 verify rate (09.4x) ..........\
00:03:30 verify rate (09.7x) ...........\
00:04:00 verify rate (10.0x) ............\
00:04:12 verify rate (04.0x) ..\
00:04:30 verify rate (10.3x) .............\
00:05:00 verify rate (10.5x) ..............\
00:05:30 verify rate (10.6x) ...............\
00:06:00 verify rate (10.8x) ................\
00:06:30 verify rate (11.0x) .................\
00:07:00 verify rate (11.2x) ..................\
00:07:30 verify rate (11.4x) ...................\
00:08:00 verify rate (11.6x) ....................\
00:08:30 verify rate (11.9x) .....................\
00:09:00 verify rate (12.0x) ......................\
00:09:30 verify rate (12.3x) .......................\
00:10:00 verify rate (12.5x) ........................\

 

More or less it is a curve, samples created in every 30 sec.

But there was a break at timestamp "00:04:12" which is displayed now.

 

Bye

szabi

[Cynthia]

The graph log is already saved in it's own log file if you should need it later on.

[obvious]

or you can just continue to use NERO....

Ahem, finally there's some 1337 fanboy who could talk us out of using Nero let alone shed some light on how bad it is. I'm so excited already.