Pain_Man Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 This one's so over the top even I can't think of anything say except shame for my country. Judge: Man Too Short For Prison SIDNEY, Neb. - A judge said a 5-foot-1 man convicted of sexually assaulting a child was too small to survive in prison, and gave him 10 years of probation instead. ADVERTISEMENT His crimes deserved a long sentence, District Judge Kristine Cecava said, but she worried that Richard W. Thompson, 50, would be especially imperiled by prison dangers. "You are a sex offender, and you did it to a child," she said. But, she said, "That doesn't make you a hunter. You do not fit in that category." Thompson will be electronically monitored the first four months of his probation, and he was told to never be alone with someone under age 18 or date or live with a woman whose children were under 18. Cecava also ordered Thompson to get rid of his pornography. He faces 30 days of jail each year of his probation unless he follows its conditions closely. "I want control of you until I know you have integrated change into your life," the judge told Thompson. "I truly hope that my bet on you being OK out in society is not misplaced."
Kenadjian Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 Maybe they should build a prison for short people. Fcuk me, whats next?
dbminter Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 You obviously didn't see the story about the cat being put on trial? I thought it was for murder but turned out it was just the cat's owner going to trial instead of euthanizing the cat outright. In essence, the cat is going on trial for attacking the neighbors.
Pain_Man Posted May 25, 2006 Author Posted May 25, 2006 You obviously didn't see the story about the cat being put on trial? I thought it was for murder but turned out it was just the cat's owner going to trial instead of euthanizing the cat outright. In essence, the cat is going on trial for attacking the neighbors. That's bizarre since cats are considered, in almost every jurisdiction, to be be wild animals. Therefore, unlike dogs, owners can't normally be held responsible for things their cats do.
Pain_Man Posted May 25, 2006 Author Posted May 25, 2006 Maybe they should build a prison for short people. Fcuk me, whats next? You wanna know what's next? Civil rights for pedophiles. That's what's coming. I have nothing against homosexuals but the laws that have been written protecting "sexual orientation" have been written so broadly they can easily be interpreted as covering pedophiles and rapists. Some pedophiles and rapists are already making this claim. It's only a matter of time before some idiot ass judge in California or Vermont, or one of our other looney bins loosely designated as "states", hands down a ruling calling child molesting and serial rape "disabilities." Or flat out says they're being "persecuted" because of their "sexual orientation." The laws should have been written: "Their shalt be no harassing consenting adults in sexual matters." That would have been a much better way of writing it. The way they're written now, it's just a matter of time before this shit happens. Mark my words.
dbminter Posted May 25, 2006 Posted May 25, 2006 That's bizarre since cats are considered, in almost every jurisdiction, to be be wild animals. Therefore, unlike dogs, owners can't normally be held responsible for things their cats do. Here's one of two links (Lost the other.) I've found on the story. http://www.courttv.com/news/2006/0524/lewis_ap.html
Pain_Man Posted May 25, 2006 Author Posted May 25, 2006 That's bizarre since cats are considered, in almost every jurisdiction, to be be wild animals. Therefore, unlike dogs, owners can't normally be held responsible for things their cats do. Here's one of two links (Lost the other.) I've found on the story. http://www.courttv.com/news/2006/0524/lewis_ap.html All I have to say is that this would be one dead goddamn cat. He'd get one shot at me and then I break his goddamn neck and not even feel bad about it. Besides that, "victims" don't control the decisions of prosecutors. DAs have absolute discretion whether to press charges. Only a state's Attorney General has rank over a DA.
lfcrule1972 Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 All cats should be shot in my opinion - fucking useless things that they are.....
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 All cats should be shot in my opinion - fucking useless things that they are..... Get a Pioneer 120. Cats hate them.
Pain_Man Posted May 26, 2006 Author Posted May 26, 2006 (edited) All cats should be shot in my opinion - fucking useless things that they are..... I like cats actually...except for the litter boxes, the hairballs, the scratching shit, the hair...because of Mrs. PM's allergies cats are out. I find I don't miss them. We've got our rats and they're just fine. One of them even runs about the house. She follows us about and comes when we call her--which gives her one up on friggin' cats. Edited May 26, 2006 by Pain_Man
lfcrule1972 Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 Get a Pioneer 120. Cats hate them. Bwahahahahahahaha !
Kenadjian Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 Get a Pioneer 120. Cats hate them. They don't exactly like .22's either.
polopony Posted May 29, 2006 Posted May 29, 2006 All cats should be shot in my opinion - fucking useless things that they are..... Get a Pioneer 120. Cats hate them.
lfcrule1972 Posted May 30, 2006 Posted May 30, 2006 I could probably get away with the Pioneer 120 - a rifle would get me into serious trouble tho !!
lfcrule1972 Posted May 31, 2006 Posted May 31, 2006 Yeah followed by if the stories about our prisons are anything to go by !! :&
Groundrush Posted May 31, 2006 Posted May 31, 2006 In order to keep a true perspective of one's importance, everyone should have a dog that will worship him and a cat that will ignore him. - Dereke Bruce Personally I'd opt for a cat over a dog....
Kenadjian Posted May 31, 2006 Posted May 31, 2006 Personally I'd opt for a cat over a dog.... Yeah, my dogs love em, every household with a dog should have a cat, it's good exercize for the dogs.
pfeerick Posted June 1, 2006 Posted June 1, 2006 Yeah, my dogs love em, every household with a dog should have a cat, it's good exercize for the dogs. I'll second that one! One of our dogs gets some good exercise, with the cat chasing the dog! Cats are useful as bed warmers in the cooler weather too! Unfortuantely there are negatives, such as the litter trays, scratches, feeding them, etc. rgds, Peter
lfcrule1972 Posted June 1, 2006 Posted June 1, 2006 licking their arses on your kitchen worktop, crapping in the neighbours gardens - cats are pointless little fuckers !
lfcrule1972 Posted June 1, 2006 Posted June 1, 2006 That was quite mild for me on my fave subject "How crap are cats ?"
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now