nelsonhf Posted May 23, 2010 Posted May 23, 2010 Hi LIGHTNING UK!, I have a TSST SH-S203B SB04 and yesterday I faced the "Track 1 is smaller on the disc than it is in the image file" problem with the latest ImgBurn (2.5.1.0). Searching the forum, I found this topic that explains the root cause of the problem (a bug in MediaTek/Samsung/LiteOn firmware) and as I couldn't post a reply to that topic (forum restriction?), I created this one. Both of my Samsung drives, the SH-S203B SB04 (DVD-RW/RAM) and the SH-M522C TS08 (Combo DVD-ROM/CD-RW) have this problem as you can see below: Image Info: Session Track Type Index Start Length LBA Session 1 Track 1 Mode 1 Index 1 00:02:00 338:20:25 0 - 1522524 Total 338:20:25 0 - 1522524 LeadOut 338:22:25 1522525 Disc info of this image burned with ImgBurn 2.5.1.0 in the SH-S203B SB04: TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S203B SB04 (ATA) Current Profile: DVD-R TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 1522524) -> LeadOut (LBA: 1522525) Track Information: Session 1... -> Track 01 (LTSA: 0, LTS: 1522496, LRA: 1522511) Same disc now read by the SH-M522C TS08: TSSTcorp CDW/DVD SH-M522C TS08 (ATA) Current Profile: DVD-ROM TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 1522524) -> LeadOut (LBA: 1522525) Track Information: Session 1... -> Track 01 (LTSA: 0, LTS: 1522524, LRA: 1522524) Now, the same image burned by Nero 7 on the SH-S203B SB04: TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S203B SB04 (ATA) Current Profile: DVD-R TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 1522527) -> LeadOut (LBA: 1522528) <<--- Nero padded the image to the next multiple of 16 Track Information: Session 1... -> Track 01 (LTSA: 0, LTS: 1522512, LRA: 1522527) This is clearly a firmware bug of MediaTek/Samsung/LiteOn drives and in the other topic, LiteOn admits it and send a test firmware that correct this bug. As I doubt that Samsung will do the same (especially with older drives) and using a program that pads the image (as Nero does) is worst (it breaks UDF standards as stated in the other topic, what can I do? Stay with ImgBurn 2.5.0.0 (as it uses TOC instead of Track info)? I don't know if is possible, but for these buggy drives, in the next version of ImgBurn, can you maybe add an option or condition to use the TOC instead of Track information as in the previous ImgBurn versions? Thanks for yours efforts, patience and ImgBurn of course
LIGHTNING UK! Posted May 23, 2010 Posted May 23, 2010 I'm sure if you read that thread properly it says I've implemented a workaround for the problem samsung/liteon drives. You just have to wait for 2.5.2.0 Where possibly, build your images with ImgBurn and you won't run into the problem in the first place. ImgBurn's images are always created so their size is a multiple of 16.
nelsonhf Posted May 23, 2010 Author Posted May 23, 2010 (edited) Yes, I read in the other thread about your fix for the LTS = LRA problem. Will the next version handle the rounding down problem too? TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S203B SB04 (ATA) Current Profile: DVD-R TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 1522524) -> LeadOut (LBA: 1522525) Track Information: Session 1... -> Track 01 (LTSA: 0, LTS: 1522496, LRA: 1522511) LRA and LTS wrong? TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S203B SB04 (ATA) Current Profile: DVD-R TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 1522527) -> LeadOut (LBA: 1522528) <<--- Nero padded the image to the next multiple of 16 Track Information: Session 1... -> Track 01 (LTSA: 0, LTS: 1522512, LRA: 1522527) LTS wrongly rounded down. Shouldn't be 1522528? I forgot to say that the image used is a Windows 7 MSDN image which was created by Microsoft's own CDIMAGE 2.54 utility. I'm not trying to pressure you. I understand that you are just strictly following the standards, which is a good thing. Thanks for you answer and sorry for any inconvenience. Edited May 23, 2010 by nelsonhf
LIGHTNING UK! Posted May 24, 2010 Posted May 24, 2010 Hmm I must apologise, the two tweaks I've put in place to get around these issues won't actually do anything for this burn and the values your drive is reporting, they're all over the place! I will test with my own S203B and a discovery mode burn of the exact same number of sectors and see what I can do. Nero probably just burnt using the incremental write type, that always seems to pad to 16 anyway. btw, it would have been useful to see the other disc info (i.e. the 'Sectors' info at the top - that's what the 'get capacity' command reports)
LIGHTNING UK! Posted May 31, 2010 Posted May 31, 2010 I just tried a DVD-RW in mine with an image exactly the same size as yours and the disc info seems fine. TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-S203B SB04 (RAID) Current Profile: DVD-RW Disc Information: Status: Complete State of Last Session: Complete Erasable: Yes Sessions: 1 Sectors: 1,522,525 Size: 3,118,131,200 bytes Time: 338:22:25 (MM:SS:FF) TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 1522524) -> LeadOut (LBA: 1522525) Track Information: Session 1... -> Track 01 (LTSA: 0, LTS: 1522528, LRA: 1522524) Pre-recorded Information: Manufacturer ID: MKM 01RW6X01 Physical Format Information (Last Recorded): Book Type: DVD-RW Part Version: 3 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: Not Specified Number of Layers: 1 Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP) Linear Density: 0.267 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 1,719,132 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 0
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now