Am I allowed to make a Screenshot of ImgBurn for Wikipedia?

[Das Schäfchen]

This is a question to Lightning UK. For every Screenshot in Wikipedia is a permission needed. But the Program is copyrighted. It would be nice, when I (and Wikipedia) become the permission for a Screenshot. Many greetings

[LIGHTNING UK!]

You can use one of the screenshots shown on the main website (in the screenshots section) if you like.

[Das Schäfchen]

Thanks. Can you tell me the version of this screenshot? I need the information, too. (http://imgburn.com/index.php?act=screenshots) Is it the version 2.5.7.0? (This is the last question;))

[LIGHTNING UK!]

Which one exactly... there are loads

 

They won't be from 2.5.7.0, no... but that doesn't mean the ones from 2.5.7.0 would actually look any different. One or two might have subtle tweaks.

[Das Schäfchen]

I mean the first from http://imgburn.com/index.php?act=screenshots (Ez-mode picker). If you don't know, which version it is, it's not the worst thing, which can happen. But I need the information for a correct and full discription. (Sorry for my English, I'm German:))

[LIGHTNING UK!]

Ok well that would have been from 2.5.5.0 or 2.5.6.0... but it'll look identical on 2.5.7.0.

[Das Schäfchen]

O.K. Then I write only 2.5. Thanks for the information and permission. If you want to see, where I have integrated it: It is here (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImgBurn)

[Das Schäfchen]

Is this okay for you?

[LIGHTNING UK!]

Yup, that's fine.

[Das Schäfchen]

I had to add a license in the file discription. Here (http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:ImgBurnscreenshot.png&filetimestamp=20120410164103) under the picture. Is that correct so?

[LIGHTNING UK!]

Probably... what's the English translation? lol

[Das Schäfchen]

I typed it in the google translate. The (not 100 percent correct) translation: (a very long link)

 

http://translate.google.de/#de|en|Diese%20Datei%20oder%20Bestandteile%20davon%20stellen%20ein%20Logo%20%28z.%20B.%20ein%20Firmenlogo%29%20oder%20ein%20%C3%A4hnliches%20Objekt%20dar.%0A%0AAuch%20wenn%20diese%20Datei%20unter%20einer%20freien%20Lizenz%20steht%20oder%20nicht%20urheberrechtlich%20gesch%C3%BCtzt%20ist%2C%20kann%20ihre%20Verbreitung%2C%20Ver%C3%A4nderung%20oder%20sonstige%20Verwertung%20durch%20besondere%20rechtliche%20Bestimmungen%20innerhalb%20und%20au%C3%9Ferhalb%20des%20Urheberrechts%20eingeschr%C3%A4nkt%20sein.%0A%0A%0A%0ADiese%20Datei%20ist%20m%C3%B6glicherweise%20nicht%20mit%20den%20Richtlinien%20von%20Wikimedia%20Commons%20kompatibel.%0A%0AEs%20sollte%20individuell%20gepr%C3%BCft%20werden%2C%20ob%20sie%20nach%20Wikimedia%20Commons%20verschoben%20werden%20darf.%0A%0ADo%20not%20transfer%20this%20file%20to%20Wikimedia%20Commons%20without%20an%20individual%20review!%0A%0A%0ADiese%20Datei%20%28oder%20Bestandteile%20derselbigen%29%20ist%20als%20offizielles%20Logo%20der%20Wikimedia%20Foundation%20oder%20eines%20ihrer%20Projekte%20marken-%20und%20urheberrechtlich%20gesch%C3%BCtzt.%20Die%20Benutzung%20in%20der%20Wikipedia%20wird%20als%20projektweite%20Ausnahme%20angesehen.%0A%0A%C2%A9%20%26%20%E2%84%A2%20Alle%20Rechte%20vorbehalten%2C%20Wikimedia%20Foundation%2C%20Inc.%20Wikipedia%C2%AE%20ist%20eine%20eingetragene%20Marke%20der%20Wikimedia%20Foundation%20Inc.

[Das Schäfchen]

This was not correct. It is very complicated;) Which license should it be? MPl, GPL, Puplic Domain, Creative Commons...

[LIGHTNING UK!]

I honestly have no idea, sorry.

[Das Schäfchen]

How about this http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en It is only a screenshot.

[LIGHTNING UK!]

That's fine apart from the 'to make commercial use of the work' bit.

 

You're free to use (share/remix) the screenshots when talking about ImgBurn - which shouldn't ever be 'commercial' - as per the license at the bottom of the main website.

 

Of course if 'commercial' means something else (i.e. maybe just advertising ImgBurn - I'm no lawyer) then you're fine to use the creative commons license for the screenshots.