cobra70 Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 I burned an ISO over bd-re 25 with LG BH08LS20. Burning has happened. The disc works with POWERDVD. The same disk does not work on Samsung BD-C5900. If I burn the same ISO on a BD-R 25, the disc works with POWER DVD and Samsung Standalone. Taking the test with ISO and BD-RE 50, BD-RE DL works with POWER DVD and Samsung Standalone. I tried a Verbatim BD-RE 25 and a Sony BD-RE 25. Same result. Does not work on Samsung standalone. How can I solve this problem? Thank you.
LIGHTNING UK! Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 Does your Samsung say it plays BD-RE 25GB discs? If it's playing the 50GB ones ok, I'd assume it should be able to handle the 25GB ones too. Maybe it requires the discs to be formatted with spare areas enabled (or disabled) ? Is the firmware on your burner and player up to date? To me, it sounds like you should be asking Samsung why their player won't play content on a BD-RE 25GB disc that works just fine on other discs.
cobra70 Posted August 22, 2012 Author Posted August 22, 2012 Does your Samsung say it plays BD-RE 25GB discs? If it's playing the 50GB ones ok, I'd assume it should be able to handle the 25GB ones too. Certainly. The manual states compatibility with BD-R e BD-RE without specifying whether they are 25 or 50. Maybe it requires the discs to be formatted with spare areas enabled (or disabled) ? I read that ImgBurn default format disks without spare areas. I tested format with e without spare areas but BD-RE 25 does not work on Samsung BD-C5900. Is the firmware on your burner and player up to date? The firmware on my burner is the last one. The firmware on my player is not the last one because with the new updates the situation is getting worse.
LIGHTNING UK! Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 You're going to have to take this up with Samsung.
cobra70 Posted August 22, 2012 Author Posted August 22, 2012 Ok. I had a doubt. This evening I tried to set with spare area, and then perform a full format. At this point the ISO could not be burned because they appeared to be too large. I created a smaller ISO and I burned it. For the first time, SAMSUNG read BD-RE disc. As I do now to recover the portion occupied spare to burn larger ISO in my BD-RE?
LIGHTNING UK! Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 As I do now to recover the portion occupied spare to burn larger ISO in my BD-RE? Does that translate to something roughly like - 'how do I recover the space that has been taken up by the spare areas so I can burn a larger ISO to my BD-RE again?' ? Answer: Full erase it again having enabled the option to format without spare areas.
cobra70 Posted August 22, 2012 Author Posted August 22, 2012 Ok... is clear that I am not English mother tongue and I do not know the English language. Thanks for the correction ... sooner or later I will learn a little bit. Full erase it again having enabled the option to format without spare areas. Ok... but in this way my SAMSUNG standalone will not read the BD-RE! In this case, I'm again to the initial problem. My BD-RE DL has these values: 23,652,352 sectors 48,440,016,896 bytes Do you think it's been formatted with "spare area"?
LIGHTNING UK! Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 You're doing very well for a non English speaking person. I just wanted to make sure I understood (correctly) what it was that you were asking. You have a choice to make. Either... you have spare areas enabled and lose some of the available discs space - but the disc plays OR you have spare areas disabled and can write bigger images to the disc - but the disc doesn't play I'm afraid you can't have it both ways! Well, I guess you could always buy another player that doesn't have the problem your Samsung one has. What was the problem with the newer firmware for the Samsung player? Maybe this issue has been fixed? If it hasn't, tell them about it so that it can be. Going by the sizes you posted, I'd say the BD-RE DL has been formatted with spare areas enabled.
cobra70 Posted August 22, 2012 Author Posted August 22, 2012 You understand perfectly what I was trying to explain. All the new firmware SAMSUNG always have reduced the potential of the bluray player and particularly the ability to read formats from a USB-connected external hd. If I decide to buy a new player would have a good advice for me? Ok. The BD-RE DL is really formatted with spare areas enabled. Now I try to reformat without spare are enabled and I burn a large ISO. Then I will try on the SAMSUNG and I will inform you! I hope to be lucky
cobra70 Posted August 23, 2012 Author Posted August 23, 2012 News: Last night I reformatted the BD-RE DL with spare area disabled. I have mastered and successfully tested on samsung standalone. The BD-RE DL works. Now I try again to format BD-RE SL with full spare area disabled. I will try to burn an iso and see if it works on SAMSUNG standalone. Stay tuned!
LIGHTNING UK! Posted August 23, 2012 Posted August 23, 2012 This probably isn't the best place to ask such questions. You want a home cinema forum/website for that - or read a home cinema magazine and look at the reviews.
cobra70 Posted August 24, 2012 Author Posted August 24, 2012 I did the test that I had said. Now the BD-RE SL works without spare area. I can not understand the meaning of what has happened. Steps: 1. Formatted the drive without spare area. 2. ISO burned. The BD-RE does not work on Samsung. 3. Formatted the drive with spare area. 4. ISO burned. The BD-RE work on the SAMSUNG standalone. 5. Formatted the disk again without sparea area. 6. ISO burned. The BD-RE is still working on the SAMSUNG standalone. What is the difference between point 2 and point 6? The first time I tried to burn the ISO directly on a blank new BD-RE. Before burning Imgburn formatted, rezero and then it wrote the ISO (Consecutive passes without my intervention). In steps 5 instead I first formatted and imgburn made the rezero. Then, in the step 6, I burned the ISO! (Two different manual steps) Imgburn behaves in a different way? There are differences in the disc if you worked with steps 1 and 2, compared with steps 5 and 6? Can you help me understand?
LIGHTNING UK! Posted August 24, 2012 Posted August 24, 2012 There shouldn't be any difference between 2 and 6. There's certainly no difference in what ImgBurn would have done at each stage.
cobra70 Posted August 25, 2012 Author Posted August 25, 2012 Ok. If the phases are the same and the mode of operation of ImgBurn is the same, the problem is in the burner's firmware. I have no idea what it could be ... but the problem needs to be right there!
Maciej Posted August 25, 2012 Posted August 25, 2012 (edited) FWIW ... As far as I've been able to establish, the question of which BD-RE disk plays in which standalone is extremely tricky. For example, I have a standalone blu-ray Panasonic DMP-BD55 (an old model, I know), but with latest firmware nevertheless. Two or so years ago, I bought a few TDK BD-RE SLs (sorry, don't remember the MID), burned films on my PC using ImgBurn (and an LG BH08LS20) and they played back flawlessly, both in PowerDVD and on the Panny. But only a week ago today, I purchased a Sony BD-RE SL (MID SONY-ES1-002) - to my surprise, the film I burned wouldn't play back on the standalone (PowerDVD - flawless). I tried formatting with and without spare areas, etc. - nothing. Finally, I had a very good look at the instruction manual for the Panny. As it turns out, the unit doesn't support playback of anything below "version 3 of the BD-RE Recording Format", while the Sony BD-RE is version 2.1. Call me stupid, but only then did I realise why I had a problem. What I'm trying to say is that your player may have problems with certain disk types. This may sound too obvious, but you never know ... Edited August 25, 2012 by Maciej
Recommended Posts