cornholio7 Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 you could get a thousand different answers to this , but i personally am happy with 95% quality rating and above
thollian Posted July 23, 2007 Author Posted July 23, 2007 on the example link you gave me, it only had for PIF 78, and mine is 2151, and so how does my rating get an 97% and theres get 98%, seems to me a difference of 2073 would be a lot...
cornholio7 Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 you have no jitter measurement and its scanned with a different drive
thollian Posted July 23, 2007 Author Posted July 23, 2007 well looks as though the burner was just diry, cause after cleaning it, I am getting alot better burns....one last screenshot of latest burn: thanks everyone for your help
thollian Posted July 23, 2007 Author Posted July 23, 2007 so ultimately isn't the disc having bad sectors and unreadable the deciding factor? I mean according to some of the numbers which are high on the PIF tests...the burn is crap, but when played back on a dvd player, or dvd-rom, the data is fully readable? Am I not getting something here? thanks
cornholio7 Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 dvd players are VERY forgiving , if you can burn and verify it should be good to go. i just don't trust discs that have high errors from the start, as some inferior discs degrade over (sometimes short) time
blutach Posted July 23, 2007 Posted July 23, 2007 Looks a lot better - relax now and happy burning. Regards
thollian Posted July 24, 2007 Author Posted July 24, 2007 (edited) dvd players are VERY forgiving , if you can burn and verify it should be good to go. i just don't trust discs that have high errors from the start, as some inferior discs degrade over (sometimes short) time yah, well I only use Verbatim or Sony discs when burning....and all the screenshots in this post, were all vertified after burn with Imgburn....well glad I can relax and enjoy burning! thanks for the help everyone! Edited July 24, 2007 by thollian
Recommended Posts