ImgBurn Compatibility

[chewy]

I have always used nero for all my burning needs, but after a little coaxing from

corn and a lot of razzing from Blu I took the jump into imgburn. This was a difficult

test as a lot of things could have screwed up. At least all drives used were standalone masters.

I started nero and imgburn, pointing each to seperate hard drives, and had them burn a dvd at 4x

on seperate burners. No dual core cpu, 512 megs of ram. 2 good burns

Edited December 27, 2005 by chewy

[polopony]

and

[chewy]

"Post here if you have something to say about ImgBurn"

[polopony]

"Post here if you have something to say about ImgBurn"

 

Im getting ready to use the Queing feature have 3 ready to go

[chewy]

"Post here if you have something to say about ImgBurn"

 

Im getting ready to use the Queing feature have 3 ready to go

 

you still have to feed the disks, no I was trying to see if nero and imgburn

would have a conflict, I was more afraid of nero taking over.

[lfcrule1972]

You need to "throw Nero wuffly to the flwoor" if it tries anything like that Chewy !

[polopony]

"Post here if you have something to say about ImgBurn"

 

Im getting ready to use the Queing feature have 3 ready to go

 

you still have to feed the disks, no I was trying to see if nero and imgburn

would have a conflict, I was more afraid of nero taking over.

 

Yeah thats true but its a really slick feature and in the new version to be released you will be able to use multiple burners and point an ISO at them if I read right .I have 4 burners that I can load into a newer box and set everything in motion before bed wake up and presto 4 burned discs ,it just keeps getting better and better but what did we expect with LUK on the job

[lfcrule1972]

just keeps getting better and better but what did we expect with LUK on the job

 

 

[chewy]

"presto 4 burned discs "

 

that will be interesting to see

 

beta testers?

Edited December 29, 2005 by chewy

[cornholio7]

done 4 with 2 burners - p.o.p.