[the possibilty of burning the VIDEO_TS folder]

windowz makes it very tedious to mount ISO images in order to view them later in a dvd player app.

Interesting....When I want to mount an image I simply right click on the ISO, highlight Mount then click on the Virtual drive letter I wish to mount on. 2 clicks, and I run Windows - but not Daemon Tools.

 

Do you use the MS CD/DVD Virtual drive control panel?-When you mount in this way is the volume label shown in the drive list in My Computer? Daemon Tools does not.

 

blutach-> I have looked into the duplicators, info in their specs however, do not make it clear if the devices are capable of burning different images from 1 hard drive concurrently.

 

scenario - 100 images 6 burners

 

burner 1-image 009

burner 2-image 098

burner 3-image 077

 

Inaddition, id be interested if any of them facility a playlist type feature. A feature when i can enter a list of images needed to be burned unattended.

 

scenario

 

bill in special fx dept wants

image -100

image -002

image- 013

 

tetron in graphic/costume design dept wants

image-030

image-065

 

telvran in render department wants

image-011

image-012

image-013

image-014

 

Best

[the possibilty of burning the VIDEO_TS folder]

dirio - to create an ISO for a DVD-5 takes 5 minutes tops.

 

And of course you can edit to your heart's content beforehand.

 

So, 5 minutes of ISO creation or risk making a coaster with Nero/Roxio etc. (which takes say 15 minutes).

 

Anyways, if you don't like making ISOs, use Nero. No-one's forcing you to use ImgBurn man.

 

Regards

 

i do use shrink ppl, each image takes around 3 mins each.

 

my point is 5 mins x 200 folders to ISO images = a frelling long time!!! nero...pfft, anyways i need to burn to 5 burners concurrently. With DVDD i make copies of the application and run multiple instances of it. Nero won't allow this!!

 

don't discount my other major point. windowz makes it very tedious to mount ISO images in order to view them later in a dvd player app. daemon tools is a work around but it is a very kludged up system. other operating systems allow a user to just double click the image in the file system to have it mounted-to un mount clicking on the 'eject' button is all that is needed. daemon is a mpitfa with all the menu/sub menu clicking to mount then unmount. this is very tedious when working with many images.

 

Why are so many ppl here so insistent i/we don't have a use for such a function and why are some trying so badly to disprove i/we find the ISO based system creates huge obstacles in our work flows?

 

In no way has anyone requested this folder burning suggestion replace the ISO burning, we ask this in addition. I get the feeling the LUK is in-capable if even implementing this feature when taking all the ppl against this folder burning suggestion in to account.

[the possibilty of burning the VIDEO_TS folder]

I have to agree. It sure would be nice to be able to generate the iso from within ImgBurn.

 

i need to be able to burn directly from a directory 'using the folders name as the volume label' that contains a VIDEO_TS folder.

 

I have just spent the last 4 hours creating ISO's from directories which contain VIDEO_TS folders in order to actually burn them.

 

I could save so much time doing other frelling stuff if this app could just burn from a folder. The use of ISO images posses another time consuming issue at the back end of my work flow. To play and view the video from the ISO's im forced to use the crappy deamon tools to mount the millions of images i have stored to preview in a dvdplayer like powerdvd. (maybe it would'nt peeve me as much if i could just assign deamon tools to mount an ISO image upon double clicking, in addition ISO creating names the file in total uppercase, so im forced to go reverse every file ISO name from full upper case to titlecase).

 

Please LUK consider this!!!