Jump to content

MrShades

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Wiltshire, UK

MrShades's Achievements

ISF Newbie

ISF Newbie (1/5)

  1. Thanks again again again LIGHTNING UK! - Probably worth a shot I guess... will report back.
  2. Aha! You CAN get DVD-R DLs - so would that be a possible route forward, or at least worth trying?
  3. Thanks again LIGHTNNG UK! It's nice to get a response from someone that knows what they're talking about ;-) Do DVD-R disks experience the same rounding issue? As you can't get DVD-R DLs it sounds as if I'm stuffed either way - I guess I'll just have to be ultra-careful with my original satnav disk in the car! Cheers, Shades
  4. I've now tried writing this image on my Pioneer DVR-215 as well as a Sony 5260S - and get identical results, with the image being written incorrectly sized. I could try a Pioneer DVR-216 and an LG unit as well, but am worried that it'll be the same. Can anyone assure me that this won't be a problem on all drives, and I should be able to find one somewhere that doesn't "round up" the size of the disk? Many thanks for any help or pointers... Shades
  5. Ah - thanks Lightning UK! Any recommendations or advice on current drives that possibly wouldn't suffer from this problem?????
  6. After producing a larger number of unusable Verbaitm DVD+R DL disks than I can't really afford, I'm turning to you guys for help and guidance. I've recently purchased a set of updated maps for my Lexus navigation system - at great expense - and ideally I'd like to archive the originals (4 of them, for different parts of Europe) and use a copy in the car. However, I'm really struggling to duplicate the DVD properly so that the nav system recognises it properly. Background on what I'm using - Pioneer DVR-215 (fw 1.19) on a Windows Vista Ultimate machine (Q6700, lots of RAM and disks!). The original disk information (from the right-hand panel in ImgBurn 2.5.2.0) is as follows: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-215 1.19 (ATAPI) Current Profile: DVD-ROM Disc Information: Status: Complete State of Last Session: Complete Erasable: No Sessions: 1 Sectors: 3,064,574 Size: 6,276,247,552 bytes Time: 681:02:74 (MM:SS:FF) TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 3064573) -> LeadOut (LBA: 3064574) Physical Format Information (Last Recorded - L0): Book Type: DVD-ROM Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: 10.08Mbps Number of Layers: 2 Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP) Linear Density: 0.293 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 2,209,503 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 0 Physical Format Information (Last Recorded - L1): Book Type: DVD-ROM Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: 10.08Mbps Number of Layers: 2 Track Path: Parallel Track Path (PTP) Linear Density: 0.293 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 1,248,285 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 0 Layer Information: Layer 0 Sectors: 2,012,896 (65.68%) Layer 1 Sectors: 1,051,678 (34.32%) ...and if I look at the Media Information for this original disk I get the following information: When I produce a disk image using ImgBurn, the image info correctly reports the structure as follows: However, when I burn this to a Verbatim DVD+R DL I get the following disk information on the burnt copy: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-215 1.19 (ATAPI) Current Profile: DVD+R DL Disc Information: Status: Complete State of Last Session: Complete Erasable: No Sessions: 1 Sectors: 3,064,576 Size: 6,276,251,648 bytes Time: 681:03:01 (MM:SS:FF) File System Information: Sectors: 3,064,574 Size: 6,276,247,552 bytes Time: 681:02:74 (MM:SS:FF) TOC Information: Session 1... (LBA: 0) -> Track 01 (Mode 1, LBA: 0 - 3064575) -> LeadOut (LBA: 3064576) Track Information: Session 1... -> Track 01 (LTSA: 0, LTS: 3064576, LRA: 0) Disc Control Blocks Information: PIONEER DVR-215 Physical Format Information (ADIP - L0): Disc ID: MKM-003-00 Book Type: DVD+R DL Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: Not Specified Number of Layers: 2 Track Path: Opposite Track Path (OTP) Linear Density: 0.293 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 16,580,607 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 2,283,519 Physical Format Information (ADIP - L1): Disc ID: MKM-003-00 Book Type: DVD+R DL Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: Not Specified Number of Layers: 2 Track Path: Opposite Track Path (OTP) Linear Density: 0.293 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 16,580,607 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 2,283,519 Physical Format Information (Last Recorded - L0): Disc ID: MKM-003-00 Book Type: DVD-ROM Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: Not Specified Number of Layers: 2 Track Path: Opposite Track Path (OTP) Linear Density: 0.293 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 15,619,391 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 2,209,503 Physical Format Information (Last Recorded - L1): Disc ID: MKM-003-00 Book Type: DVD-ROM Part Version: 1 Disc Size: 120mm Maximum Read Rate: Not Specified Number of Layers: 2 Track Path: Opposite Track Path (OTP) Linear Density: 0.293 um/bit Track Density: 0.74 um/track First Physical Sector of Data Area: 196,608 Last Physical Sector of Data Area: 15,619,391 Last Physical Sector in Layer 0: 2,209,503 Layer Information: Layer 0 Sectors: 2,012,896 (65.68%) Layer 1 Sectors: 1,051,680 (34.32%) ...and the Media Information shows, incorrectly, as follows: I have now tried everything that I can think of to get a copy that accurately reflects the disk information of the original (as I'm sure that's making a difference to whether the Nav system will recognise it as a valid disk or not). Can anyone help me, or point me in the right direction please? Whilst I have a few DLs left I can see them quickly vanishing in a puff of cash if I just use trial and error on this. Many thanks for all and any help. Shades
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.