Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What are the license details?

Could imgburn be redistributed with an application?

The usage would be for writing data disks; not music, not video...

Is there a fee for such usage - one-time or per user or fees voluntarily paid?

 

This seems like it should be a FAQ but I could not find the answer by searching.

I searched forums on licensing and got no useful results... just saw the windows flag waving (for a long time) like it was waiting to download.

Posted
As it currently stands, it cannot be sold / packaged with any commercial / shareware titles.

 

Tell me more about what you have in mind?

 

 

I would like to package it with commercial software

to give the application the ability to save data to DVD/CD.

 

The application could basically drive ImgBurn.exe, sending it command line switches.

Perhaps we could come to some payment agreement?

I prefer to speak about details offline.

Posted

Why not provide a link to the ImgBurn website? I know there are some programs which link the lame encoder because they aren't allowed to package it.

Posted

Dear linx05 and others,

 

My thought is

 

(a) to give credit and $ to ImgBurn author and

(B) not have to burden users of an application with going out to an external web site.

 

If you call ImgBurn "lame" , could you suggest better alternatives?

 

 

 

 

 

 

As it currently stands, it cannot be sold / packaged with any commercial / shareware titles.

 

Tell me more about what you have in mind?

 

 

I would like to package it with commercial software

to give the application the ability to save data to DVD/CD.

 

The application could basically drive ImgBurn.exe, sending it command line switches.

Perhaps we could come to some payment agreement?

I prefer to speak about details offline.

Posted
If you call ImgBurn "lame" , could you suggest better alternatives?

 

There is NO better alternative. :|

 

 

As far as the 'lame' comment...Look HERE!

 

( If it's not the best, it definitely in the running...)

 

B)

Posted
Dear linx05 and others,

 

My thought is

 

a/ to give credit and $ to ImgBurn author and

b/ not have to burden users of an application with going out to an external web site.

 

If you call ImgBurn "lame" , could you suggest better alternatives?

Time to chuck in my 2 cents, for whatever little it's worth.

 

a/ That's a given. Afterall, nothing is free when the work of others is sold as part of a commercial package.

 

b/ I'm in 2 minds about this. I can certainly see your point of view and I respect that. However, potential users of your software package should also know that you or your organisation are not the developers of this part of your package and they should be informed as to where this software originates.

 

c/ Something I've just thought of :- Hypothetically, if a deal is done between yourself and Lightning_UK to include ImgBurn in a commercial venture, are you guys going to be the ones supporting the ImgBurn end of the package or are your customers going to flood this forum looking for advice on why their crappy CMC MAG media is failing?

 

 

LAME is a project. It's not an opinion given to a piece of software.

 

 

<Opinion mode off. Please insert 2 cents to continue..........>

Posted

2c inserted

 

How "burdensome" is it for users to go to a website?

 

(Gee 2c didn't buy me much)

 

Regards

Posted

I already knew about one kind of LAME (linux administration made easy)

and even LAMP (Lnux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) but not the LAME (LAME Ain't an MP3 Encoder) you mention.

 

Thanks for the enlightenment!

 

 

 

Dear linx05 and others,

 

My thought is

 

a/ to give credit and $ to ImgBurn author and

b/ not have to burden users of an application with going out to an external web site.

 

If you call ImgBurn "lame" , could you suggest better alternatives?

Time to chuck in my 2 cents, for whatever little it's worth.

 

a/ That's a given. Afterall, nothing is free when the work of others is sold as part of a commercial package.

 

b/ I'm in 2 minds about this. I can certainly see your point of view and I respect that. However, potential users of your software package should also know that you or your organisation are not the developers of this part of your package and they should be informed as to where this software originates.

 

c/ Something I've just thought of :- Hypothetically, if a deal is done between yourself and Lightning_UK to include ImgBurn in a commercial venture, are you guys going to be the ones supporting the ImgBurn end of the package or are your customers going to flood this forum looking for advice on why their crappy CMC MAG media is failing?

 

 

LAME is a project. It's not an opinion given to a piece of software.

 

 

<Opinion mode off. Please insert 2 cents to continue..........>

Posted
If you call ImgBurn "lame" , could you suggest better alternatives?

lol I just saw this. Classic. Sorry rayimage. :thumbup:

Posted

There are just too many acronyms in computers to keep track of them all.

 

I agree that its funny mistake and one easily made by someone who isn't using a computer to make music disks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.