Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Wondershare Filmora Crack is a program designed to make the video editing process as simple as possible while maintaining powerful and versatile software. If you’re new to video editing or you’re a seasoned editor who just wants a faster way, take a look. For me, Filmora Video Editor can now get closer to the functionality of other complex video editing tools such as Adobe Premiere, Sony Vegas Pro, etc. The simple and easy-to-learn process makes it the most accessible! https://pcsoftz.org/
  3. Last week
  4. This is fantastic!! Thank you 🙏 Is it too early to say approx when the next ImgBurn build will be released?
  5. I still don’t see where IngBurn fits into the equation. What do you think you mean by ‘download’ ? Do you just want to install the games so you can play them? Didn’t the disc come with instructions?
  8. No problem, I can add support for that. There are other fields that are meant to be set to a specific value when burning CD-I discs, and they wouldn't be set correctly even when you edit the CUE to say MODE2. A proper fix will enable the software to set the 'session format' correctly when setting the write parameters.
  9. It's likely that ImgBurn will receive no more updates since it's been 9 years? Either way I love the app! If there is an update, I'm hoping you would be open to adding support for mounting cue files that utilize "CDI" mode as defined in the CDRWIN CUE specifications (mmc3r10g specifications, page 223, Table 240 - Disc Type Byte Format). Essentially - adding support for this cue type: FILE "track1.bin" BINARY TRACK 01 CDI/2352 INDEX 01 00:00:00 This is the proper spec for Philips CD-i cue files. Currently such cue files need to be manually edited to replace "CDI" with "MODE2" to get them to burn. I was initially hesitant to make such a request because it admittedly IS an easy userside fix, but as a Philips CD-i afficionado I'm often seeing users complain that they can't burn their CD-i .bin files even though the "CDI" is proper for the cues to use in this instance, and there are thousands of Philips CD-i bin/cues out in the wild. Thank you guys for this fantastic piece of software!
  10. I’m not so sure this is anything to do with ImgBurn. Are you trying to copy a disc?
  12. The 212 definitely is an unreliable performer when it comes to writing 8x DVD+RW. It fluctuates between writing at 6x and 8x maximum. You do one write and it's 6x max. You use the same disc that just wrote at 6x max and write the same image in the same enclosure and conditions, and you get 8x!
  13. Mount the ISO in a virtual drive program (or Explorer) and then point ImgBurn's Build mode at that virtual drive. It'll then be able to shift things around so it complies with DVD Video specs.
  14. Made a DVDFab backup, of a DVD, to put in a +R/DL disc. This is the second of two; first burned successfully, but the second pops up the titular error. What's it mean? I've included a screenshot & the relevant section of the logs. imgburnlog.txt
  15. Nothing new to report since the last beta was released back in November.
  16. Dare I ask about the new release ? I have used the software since it began and Decrypter before it. Would love a new updated release
  17. Well, now I don't know WHAT to think! After the failed burn from before, the NEW enclosure I installed, completely different manufacturer, was ALSO returning Logical Unit messages on all inserted discs. So, I swapped in another Vantec enclosure, which was the same type that appeared dead before. (This one Vantec randomly causes drives to appear with blank contents in File Explorer until power is cycled. Vantec makes about 50% junk.) Now, the same disc that was writing at 3.3x is back to 8x! It's POSSIBLE both enclosures went bad simultaneously as the OWC had been sitting on a shelf unused for years. If the universe is ruled by god, I wouldn't put it past him.
  18. Yeah, the 212 is junk as well. I put in a brand new unformatted 8x DVD+RW, wrote it once, played fine. Write to it a 2nd time, and it never got beyond 3.3x. Whenever this happens, Verify will always fail.
  19. Further testing has shown the Pioneer drives are still junk when it comes to writing 8x DVD+RW. I put in a brand new, unformatted disc, let ImgBurn format and write it, and Verify failed on it. So, Pioneer has taken SLIGHT steps forward, but are still junk. In fact, the 212 DESTROYED the brand new DVD+RW I just tested! I tried using it again in an LG WH16NS60 and it won't even get past Logical Unit is in process of becoming ready. Which is what ASUS used to do on rewritable discs. EDIT: Actually, I may have jumped to a conclusion too soon. It could be the enclosure. I took out the 212 and put in an NS60 and I still get Logical Unit messages on all DVD+RW discs. Since it's highly unlikely both drives went bad at the same time and since I've tried other DVD+RW discs, the conclusion is either the enclosure, the USB cable, or the USB port are to blame. More to come. Must have been the enclosure. I used a different enclosure with the 212 and the same disc that had at first appeared to have been destroyed and the Logical Unit message went away. I used the same USB cable, so it's not the cable or port. Could be a power supply issue as the other enclosure uses a different type of power supply.
  20. Earlier
  21. @6000RPM The show stopper issue for M-Disc is cost and does not appear to offer a significant enough real world difference in longevity over regular optical media to matter given the quality regular stuff will likely last decades at the least. so lets just say as a ball park figure that standard optical DVD media last roughly 50 years before optical drives can no longer read that data. that's likely plenty enough time for most given us humans tend to last around 80 years on average (maybe around 100 years at best) and unless someone is quite young at this point, I suspect many (if not most(?)) of us into optical media backup probably have some age on us (since we are a little more old-school at this point in time) which means in say roughly 30-50 years from now we are going to be quite old, possibly dead (it's plausible I could be dead in 30-50 years from now from natural causes), and I don't really expect future generations to care much about optical media as time passes as it seems many don't really care about data backup all that much as even a fair amount of the ones that do have data they don't want to lose tend to roll-the-dice and hope their device does not fail them before moving to another device etc. also, you got the 'SATA' standard... as long as this remains common on computer hardware that should make things easy enough to read back the data from optical media (CD/DVD) for the foreseeable future. but say the SATA standard fizzles out in 10-20 years from now, it will be just a matter of time before it becomes more difficult to find hardware to read the data on the CD/DVD media. but I figure at the very least, optical CD/DVD media should still be a solid alternative for long term storage over hard drives through at least the current decade and probably the next, but after that (i.e. 2040+) who knows. because lets say they faze out SATA connections from general computer hardware in about 10 years from now, that would probably mean we should be safe enough at least another 10+ years beyond that point (like it not being too difficult to find hardware that will work with optical media), but after that who knows. with BD media things tends to look worse... initial cost of the burner and media is a little steep (i.e. hard drives tend to be more appealing at this point, especially given DVD recordable media is still good enough as long as you don't have boatloads of data to backup), less drives out there in general that can read it (since just about any computer with a optical drive can read CD/DVD media but likely not BD), and potentially less reliable as CD/DVD media since your cramming in a lot more data in the same physical space etc. also, another negative is BD media came around a bit too late, so it never really took off (since computers never really shipped with drives to read BD media), since I would say that optical media was pretty much at it's peak in the 2000's as much beyond that it seems to started to lose it's appeal with the masses, especially as the 2010's decade progressed, as I suspect by the end of this current 2020's decade it will be that much less used than it is currently. but hopefully they still sell enough CD/DVD recordable discs to keep them being manufactured for the foreseeable future. because I think that's another thing that will determine when optical media will start to really disappear is whether manufacturers continue making them or not. because if it gets to the point where no one wants to make them anymore, then it's time to start worrying a bit. p.s. while I do have some additional side data that would be nice to backup on BD media, it's not enough of a benefit for me to justify the initial cost of the BD burner/media. so in the end I just stick to recordable CD/DVD media for some level of backups. I use CD mainly for standard audio CD's and DVD mainly for higher importance data backup at this point in time along with some level of other data I have that's small enough to fit onto a 4.7GB DVD (which is where the BD media would give me a solid improvement, but like I said, not enough benefit to justify the cost of the burner/media).
  22. That's why I miss those days.
  23. So, you're using 2 WH14NS40 drives? Writing in a 1.03 firmware drive and verifying in a 1.05 firmware drive? If that's the case, I'd wait and see if it happens again, but this time use the 1.05 drive to write the BD XL disc.
  24. Normally impossible due to the permissions. If application is installed in $CommonProgramFiles, user won't be able to modify the INI file.
  25. @dbminter, yes. Verification is successful though, zero errors. Here is the graph: Do note that the disk was written using v1.03 firmware and verified on v1.05. This is Verbatim ~100Gb M-Disc.
  26. Is this the first time you've tried BD XL media? I know one of the reasons the WH16NS40 is not usable, as far as I'm concerned, is it doesn't properly write to double layer BD media. 9 times out of 10, it writes it incorrectly.
  27. See if this helps: Tools --> Settings --> Build --> Page 1 --> Advanced --> Check the box for Include Reparse Point Files. If it's already checked, don't change it as that won't help.
  1. Load more activity
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.