Shamus_McFartfinger
-
Posts
2,665 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Shamus_McFartfinger
-
-
You could also use WinRAR if you have it installed.
http://download.cnet.com/WinRAR-32-bit/3000-2250_4-10007677.html
Just right-click on the ISO and "open with" WinRAR.
-
Thank you so much for your help. I forgot to mention that when it asks for your DVD size it has 4.3 GB and my DVD is 4.7 GB should I change the 4.3 to 4.7?
Just for the record, your 4.7 GB disk needs a filesystem to store its data - just like a cupboard needs shelves and drawers to make it useful. That said, your disk needs a filesystem so it knows where to put everything. That comes to around 400MB and is why you only have 4.3GB available. Figure on losing around 10 percent of the maximum capacity of any media whether it's a floppy disk, a CD or a large harddrive to the requirements of the native filesystem.
To put it another way, divide the maximum capacity of any storage media by 10 and then multiply that figure by 9 and that will give you a rough estimate of how much space you actually have. For example, an unformatted 2TB harddrive has a capacity of 2TB. Once you format it, your capacity drops to 1.81TB or roughly 90% of what was available.
<drunk and tired mode off>
-
It's a joy that all of you are measuring your hardware with each other, but is this as useful as help gets?
Ahh.... sardonic wit. How delightful. See the pink bit at the top of the page? I suggest you focus on following basic instructions prior to subjecting we peasants to your plainly obvious literary gift and poor punctuation.
-
Thank you!
The title of thsi topic should actually beginn with How, not Who...
You're welcome.
-
1. First question, and sorry if it's a stupid one, are there Standalone DVD Players (which are connected to the TV) which can play mp3's from a DVD-R Disc?
Yes, there are. The problem isn't usually how it's burned or what it's burned with but rather the player itself. A "top-of-the-line" DVD/Blu-Ray player that costs you $300 will usually have more restrictions placed on it than a Chinese knock-off you can buy for $50 that plays almost anything. At least that's my experience.
I burned the DVD-R with these settings:
I moved all the mp3's to one folder and chose it.
The settings:
Build Mode
Data Type: MODE1/2048
File System: ISO9660 + Joliet + UDF
UDF Revision: 1.02
This looks fine.
2. Can you tell me if it would play on a capable Standalone DVD Player with these settings?
See above.
3. Did I need to add the UDF File System, or it wasn't necessary, or maybe it's a problem to use this file system in this kind of DVD?
If you don't know what it does, don't change it. That said, you didn't hurt anything.
4. What are the optimal setting for burning DVD-R or mp3's that I want to play on a standalone DVD Player?
Leave the settings alone. They work fine just as they are.
5. And one general question, is it OK to use all the file systems (ISO9660 + Joliet + UDF) when burning AVI's, MKV's or MP3's so I don't need to worry that a standalone player won't recognize or play because of an unnecessary file system?
Please see the answer above. Do yourself a favour and open up the ImgBurn settings and hit the big DEFAULT button.
The default settings are default for a reason. If you don't understand them, don't play with them.
-
I have 5 in the PC case and 2 of these that are full...
http://www.imgburn.com/index.php?act=reviews&rev=2
<thread hijack alert>
Hmm... that's an interesting bit of hardware. I wonder how well the 9 bay version of this thingy would work as a NAS/file storage unit filled with harddrives instead? I need to replace my current file servers but keeping everything cool would appear to be the biggest problem with the Addonics case.
Hmm...
What do you think? I'm open to suggestions.... from anyone...
EDIT: I just checked the homepage for this thing and I see all sorts of configuration options. The biggest worry I have is data security. I keep a backup of everything - which means I'll need two of these things. Lightning, what's your professional opinion of these as a NAS?
-
Mine works fine with 15 physical drives
Any chance of a photo of this beastie?
I'll show you mine if you show me yours.
-
hi, I have 2 drives and my second drive is not recognize. I read the manual and the destination drive only has one. Need help, thanks..:>)
-
Yeah I'm with Shamus.
My disc burning nowadays is just some Iso backups, mostly D/L.
Everything else is usb pen drives or HDD. And that just feels like a half way house to whats coming next in data storage.
Just my 2p
I'm glad somebody agrees with me. A quick check on Ebay shows that I can buy a 8gig flash drive for $15. Eight gigs for fifteen dollars! ..and it's multisession capable straight out of the box. Like you, I burn a few ISos, maybe build a few here and there but flash drives and hard drives are a hell of a lot easier, more convenient, less problematic, safer and also faster.
Optical media was the ducks' nuts 6 or 7 years ago. It still has it's place but multi-terabyte PCs and the media players that can connect to them (XBox, PS3 and others) have taken their toll on its dominance. Just an opinion...
<old fart mode off>
-
Hello forum!
Am I able to grab audio-Files from a cd to mp3 with imgburn?
Nope. ImgBurn doesn't do this. Go and download Audiograbber. It's almost as old as I am and it hasn't been updated in years but it's still one of the best programs I've ever used - and still use. It's freeware in the best way. No malware or trojans etc. A really, really great piece of software.
-
Just explain that ImgBurn is an excellent solution to several other needs (as you sort of already have) ... but not to the requirement for an incremental backup tool.
ImgBurn was never meant to be like Nero. It's a professional tool designed to give experienced users control of the burn process. Multisession has been beaten to death for years and, in that time, nobody has come up with a compelling reason why Lightning_UK should implement it.
Both of you seem to agree that optical disk technology is not reliable enough for a proper backup solution
It isn't. It never has been. You seem like a smart guy so I'll let you in on a little secret. Burned media doesn't last. Pressed media (like commercial DVDs) last longer because they don't delaminate. When you burn optical media, you expose it to heat. This heat causes an irreversible chemical reaction which can separate the individual layers of the media. The experts call it disk rot. I can't begin to count how many disks I've burned in the last 10 years. Somewhere between 5 and 10 thousand, I suppose - all of which have gone into the bin.
I haven't voted in your poll, cos that's not the sort of thing that has much influence on LUK's ImgBurn roadmap.
I didn't create the poll. I did, however, vote in it.
I hesitate to speak for him, but he knows lots of folks would like multi - however, he's not on some kind of messianic trip to bring an answer to everyone's needs ... he has his own vision for the program, and if somebody's request doesn't fit with his plans then it just has to wait low down on the list.You've almost got right but not quite. Yes - Lightning_UK does what he sees fit with this program. Afterall, it's his baby. That said, I've seen things implemented by request just because the suggestion was a good suggestion. Hundreds of things have been added since this programs' humble beginnings as ImgBuilder version 0.0.0.1 back in 2005. Multisession is a dog. Pure and simple.
Having said that, it was worth you making your thoughts known - just don't expect any particular result.
This isn't facetube. Trolls are far and few between here. You asked a question and got an honest response. The rest of the internet population should be so lucky.
-
when trying to burn file to disc my free space is over. it says my free space is 105%. the folder to burn is 4.59GB and my disc says it is 4.7GB yet when i look at my drive it says 4.37GB free of 4.37GB. Is there a setting i have wrong? why is the disc reading less than what it is supposed to have??
I have a rather poor analogy for you but bear with me.
Think of a CD or DVD or harddrive as an empty wardrobe. Your wardrobe has no shelves and no drawers but it does have a maximum capacity. The maximum amount of stuff you can cram into it. However, with no shelves or drawers, you wardrobe is basically a box. To make this box into something you can use, you add shelves and drawers which take up space. Your CD or harddrive needs a filesystem in which to store files - which takes up space. The space your filesystem uses is subtracted from the maximum capacity of your disk - which gives you the actual *usable* space on your disk or harddrive.
For example, if you buy a 2 terabyte harddrive, the *actual* usable capacity is around 1.81 terabytes. 200 gigabytes is used by the operating system to create areas on the drive for files to be written.
-
I used PS3 Media Server to playback files on my computer HHD over ethernet cable to PS3 with reasonable results. Does away with all the transcoding & burning...
Just to be pedantic, PS3 Media Server does the heavy lifting. Matroska files (.x264) must be transcoded on the PC before sending the output to the PS3. It's still a cheap and effective way of doing things, though. Personally, I can't wait for a proper version of XBMC to make its way to the PS3.
-
ive burned atleast 40 games before i had to send my laptop in to be whiped clean. all witht he same dvd's so. is that the only possible answer?
Pretty much. Ritek media is garbage. 10 years ago, Ritek media was the best money could buy. These days, it's rubbish.
Burning data to a disk is the easy part. Being able to read it back is something else.
-
Is the layer break the only reason for a .mds?
Pretty much, yes.
4314 Bytes (in my sample read/write) is a bit much for a layer break definition.
If that's what it is then that's what it is. I'm not a programmer. I'm a forklift driver. Lightning_UK! can most most likely expand on why it's 4k in size if he feels the need to.
-
Hi.
Basic question ...
When I create an image of a DVD, I get an .iso and a .mds file (as per configuration).
Now ... when writing back this .iso to a DVD, I can either (1.) select the .iso file (then the .mds is not used) or (2.) the .mds file (where both .iso and .mds is used).
What's the difference of the finally burned DVD between choosing the .iso file (1.) or the .mds file (2.)?
In other words ... what does the .mds file change to the burn result?
Thanks,
The .mds (Media Descriptor) file contains info like where the layerbreak is on your DVD. ImgBurn reads the .mds file and burns your disk accordingly. This means seamless playback on your DVD player without pausing/stuttering when it goes from layer 1 to layer 2. (Obviously, dual layer DVDs have 2 layers).
-
I 12:44:09 Source Media Type: DVD-R (Book Type: DVD-R) (Disc ID: CMC MAG. AM3) (Speeds: 2x; 4x; 6x; 8x)
You might want to try some better quality media as well. CMC Magnetics is garbage. It's been garbage for as long as I can remember. Try Taiyo Yuden (my preference) or legitimate Verbatim media.
-
Could it be a PS3 setting that's wrong?
You know you can change the zoom function of your PS3? Yes? Also, have you tried copying your converted .mkv file to the PS3 harddrive instead of trying to play from a disk?
-
No one compels. This is just a suggestion.
Here's a hint: If you want something implemented, have compelling argument. Logic is hard sometimes, isn't it?
That said, a blank CD is worth, what, around 15 cents?
There is a mess of them with the lapse of time.English is the preferred language in this forum. Your responses should be simple and to the point. This isn't a cryptic crossword in the New York Times.
To be brutally honest, if you accidentally delete a file, that's your problem. If you get a virus, that's your problem. If your harddrive dies or gets errors, that's your problem.
Awesome arguments! Yes, these are my problems, but I need a solution once and for all!Congratulations. You have redefined the word "idiot". You have simultaneously ignored the true purpose of this software and ignored my own backup suggestion, including the explanation I gave you regarding optical media. You truly are in a class of your own. I'd be surprised if you can get out of bed in the morning without hurting yourself.
So what are you doing at this forum? Why do you use ImgBurn? Why do you even own optical drive?
3 questions? 3 answers.
1. It's possible, just possible that some of the people asking questions here might need some help. You, on the other hand, are obviously one of the chosen few that already know everything, which is a rare treat for the rest of us. How about you pull your bottom lip over your head and swallow?
2. It's the best software available for what it does. (I'm not going too fast for you, am I?)
3. For some tasks optical drives are still necessary, such as burning and installing linux distros.... which amuses me a great deal.
What has me mystified is the fact that you are convinced that multisession burning is the way forward, when those of us who know better are, apparently, wrong.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
Albert Einstein
-
There are not only a critical data. Raw photofiles from the last weekend for example. It is much easier to burn & forget.
Burn and forget? Sorry, but this just isn't a compelling argument for creating and installing a device driver that causes chaos with the way the program functions. InCD (part of the Nero package that allows multisession burning) created havoc with this program and its predecessor. That said, a blank CD is worth, what, around 15 cents? You could lash out and spend a few cents to compliment this FREE software or do what the rest of the business world does; keep your backups on HD. I'm pretty sure Google doesn't use CDs for backups.
Then pick up on demand. Storing them on rewritables CAN cause the loss by viruses, filesystem errors, unintended deleting.
Ever heard of disk rot? I suggest you look it up. As for the three examples you've given above, they are management problems outside the scope of this software. To be brutally honest, if you accidentally delete a file, that's your problem. If you get a virus, that's your problem. If your harddrive dies or gets errors, that's your problem.
FWIW, I run 8 machines here with around 30TB of data. This isn't a pissing contest, just the facts. I do backups to HD because it's the best way to do it and, honestly, the only way to do it. If you want to keep your photos safe, go buy an external HD or something. Multisession writing to CD or DVD was fabulous 10 years ago. These days, there are better and cheaper options available.
-
I do not understand why I'm not allowed to answer in existing topic therefore start another new one. With poll at last.
Those 2 pennies:
None of rewritable media allows to store data forever. By definition. All those RWs, HDDs and Flashes do allow to rewrite the data. Accidentally or intentionally. Incremental backup to multisession DVD-R is a great thing. Unfortunately without this cool software.
Hmmm... Your question is a little cryptic but I'll try my best.
In my opinion, (and just my opinion), incremental backups to CD or DVD is a painfully pointless exercise. If you need to backup critical data files, you can download free software from places like Sourceforge or even the Microsoft website that will compare the new data with old data and overwrite automatically it - if you choose to do so. A freeware cron/scheduler tool would also work if you know a few basic DOS commands.
Personally, my backups go to HD. It's easier, faster, safer and more convenient. I keep 2 copies of everything I want on different drives on different computers. Files I *really* need to keep safe are stored on 4 different machines. Backing up files to an optical disk is an archaic, unreliable and slow way of preserving your data.
<opinion mode off>
-
I have to agree. Multisession burning was a great idea 10 years ago when 20gig harddrives were $500 a shot and CD writers needed a second mortgage taken out on the house. These days, a 2TB drive can be had for less than $100. Hardware is so cheap these days it isn't funny and quality backup software can be downloaded for free from places like Sourceforge. In this day and age, I don't understand why anyone would want to use an outdated format like CDs to store backups.
-
Yes, I agree with you about the media quality, but I have a reader that is perfectly functional, but it has problem with media burned at 8x or higher (sometimes it reads them, and most of the times it doesn't do it). The only way to burn at such low speeds is buying an old device that burns at max 4x? Or it won't burn the media as the minimum writing speed is 8x?
Your media and your drive control the write speed. ImgBurn just passes that information along. If your drive has a problem writing at 8x (which is slower than my broadband connection), it might be time to invest in a new drive. FWIW, a CD burned at 8x is 1200k/sec. Very, very slow.
-
Do you see the nature of what it's come to though? I understand your points Rincewind and they are valid to a degree, but does it make much sense to uncheck the box that says "I agree to the license agreement" to your average user? It causes confusion and adds unnecessary ads. I've donated before but lightning UK has no removed them. It's certainly not a good start to encourage donations.
I don't use Winamp, so I can't testify to that.
Lightning UK. Respond.
A demand to respond? Hmm... that's unlikely to win any popularity points. At any rate, in my capacity as a beta tester, professional forklift operator and amateur BBQ chef, I find myself uniquely qualified to respond to your query in a format that doesn't tax your mental faculties.
1. ImgBurn is freeware
2. To offset server costs, monies to host this service must come from somewhere
3. The offered toolbar is "somewhere"
4. If you've neither the brains nor the wit to read the "terms and conditions", you have but three (3) options available to you:
Option 4a: Accept and install the toolbar.
Option 4b: Decline and install Imgburn only.
Option 4c: Dig a hole and toss your computer into it. This option is for those who lack the mental acuity to manage something as complicated as a PC.
Now, given your obvious ability to read, your understanding that server costs must be paid for by someone and that you are unlikely to throw your computer into a ditch in the foreseeable future, why not cut Lightning_UK a bit of slack? Afterall, your use of this program has cost you nothing.
I get this error with burning bluray dual layer's
in ImgBurn Support
Posted
The basic explanation is this:- your source drive (your harddrive) can't supply your destination drive (your burner) with data quickly enough. That's it. There's lots of reasons this can happen.
1. Slow HD
2. Fragmented HD
3. Crappy cabling
4. Other operational tasks flogging your HD to death while you're trying to read from it - such as virus scans, Secunia (great program BTW) or anything else that needs to read or write to your HD.
That said, it's not a big problem. ImgBurn has Burnproof enabled by default, which means even though these warning appear, it won't affect the burn. The quote from your log above aren't errors but merely warnings. You can fix the "problem" permanently by slowing your burn speed.