Das Schäfchen Posted April 10, 2012 Posted April 10, 2012 This is a question to Lightning UK. For every Screenshot in Wikipedia is a permission needed. But the Program is copyrighted. It would be nice, when I (and Wikipedia) become the permission for a Screenshot. Many greetings
LIGHTNING UK! Posted April 10, 2012 Posted April 10, 2012 You can use one of the screenshots shown on the main website (in the screenshots section) if you like.
Das Schäfchen Posted April 10, 2012 Author Posted April 10, 2012 Thanks. Can you tell me the version of this screenshot? I need the information, too. (http://imgburn.com/index.php?act=screenshots) Is it the version 2.5.7.0? (This is the last question;))
LIGHTNING UK! Posted April 10, 2012 Posted April 10, 2012 Which one exactly... there are loads They won't be from 2.5.7.0, no... but that doesn't mean the ones from 2.5.7.0 would actually look any different. One or two might have subtle tweaks.
Das Schäfchen Posted April 10, 2012 Author Posted April 10, 2012 I mean the first from http://imgburn.com/index.php?act=screenshots (Ez-mode picker). If you don't know, which version it is, it's not the worst thing, which can happen. But I need the information for a correct and full discription. (Sorry for my English, I'm German:))
LIGHTNING UK! Posted April 10, 2012 Posted April 10, 2012 Ok well that would have been from 2.5.5.0 or 2.5.6.0... but it'll look identical on 2.5.7.0.
Das Schäfchen Posted April 10, 2012 Author Posted April 10, 2012 O.K. Then I write only 2.5. Thanks for the information and permission. If you want to see, where I have integrated it: It is here (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ImgBurn)
Das Schäfchen Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 I had to add a license in the file discription. Here (http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:ImgBurnscreenshot.png&filetimestamp=20120410164103) under the picture. Is that correct so?
LIGHTNING UK! Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 Probably... what's the English translation? lol
Das Schäfchen Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 I typed it in the google translate. The (not 100 percent correct) translation: (a very long link) http://translate.google.de/#de|en|Diese%20Datei%20oder%20Bestandteile%20davon%20stellen%20ein%20Logo%20%28z.%20B.%20ein%20Firmenlogo%29%20oder%20ein%20%C3%A4hnliches%20Objekt%20dar.%0A%0AAuch%20wenn%20diese%20Datei%20unter%20einer%20freien%20Lizenz%20steht%20oder%20nicht%20urheberrechtlich%20gesch%C3%BCtzt%20ist%2C%20kann%20ihre%20Verbreitung%2C%20Ver%C3%A4nderung%20oder%20sonstige%20Verwertung%20durch%20besondere%20rechtliche%20Bestimmungen%20innerhalb%20und%20au%C3%9Ferhalb%20des%20Urheberrechts%20eingeschr%C3%A4nkt%20sein.%0A%0A%0A%0ADiese%20Datei%20ist%20m%C3%B6glicherweise%20nicht%20mit%20den%20Richtlinien%20von%20Wikimedia%20Commons%20kompatibel.%0A%0AEs%20sollte%20individuell%20gepr%C3%BCft%20werden%2C%20ob%20sie%20nach%20Wikimedia%20Commons%20verschoben%20werden%20darf.%0A%0ADo%20not%20transfer%20this%20file%20to%20Wikimedia%20Commons%20without%20an%20individual%20review!%0A%0A%0ADiese%20Datei%20%28oder%20Bestandteile%20derselbigen%29%20ist%20als%20offizielles%20Logo%20der%20Wikimedia%20Foundation%20oder%20eines%20ihrer%20Projekte%20marken-%20und%20urheberrechtlich%20gesch%C3%BCtzt.%20Die%20Benutzung%20in%20der%20Wikipedia%20wird%20als%20projektweite%20Ausnahme%20angesehen.%0A%0A%C2%A9%20%26%20%E2%84%A2%20Alle%20Rechte%20vorbehalten%2C%20Wikimedia%20Foundation%2C%20Inc.%20Wikipedia%C2%AE%20ist%20eine%20eingetragene%20Marke%20der%20Wikimedia%20Foundation%20Inc.
Das Schäfchen Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 This was not correct. It is very complicated;) Which license should it be? MPl, GPL, Puplic Domain, Creative Commons...
Das Schäfchen Posted April 11, 2012 Author Posted April 11, 2012 How about this http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en It is only a screenshot.
LIGHTNING UK! Posted April 11, 2012 Posted April 11, 2012 That's fine apart from the 'to make commercial use of the work' bit. You're free to use (share/remix) the screenshots when talking about ImgBurn - which shouldn't ever be 'commercial' - as per the license at the bottom of the main website. Of course if 'commercial' means something else (i.e. maybe just advertising ImgBurn - I'm no lawyer) then you're fine to use the creative commons license for the screenshots.
Recommended Posts