jkessels Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 I have a big problem: buring video DVD's works great, I can play them anywhere, but burning data DVD's fails spectacularly. It looks like sector zero is not written. I've tried several different ISO's from various sources, including freshly made new ISO's, Philips DVD-R and Sony DVD+R, lower burn speeds, different burn programs, new official firmware and new region-free firmware, two different burners (NEC 3550 and NEC 3510), but no joy. Burning movies works great, but why can't I burn data? The ImgBurn Verify says: I/O Error! Device: [1:0:0] _NEC DVD_RW ND-3550A 1.07 (G:) (ATA) ScsiStatusL 0x02 Iterpretation: Check Condition CDB: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 Interpretation: Read(10) - Sector: 0 Sense Area: F0 00 03 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 11 00 00 00 00 00 Interpretation: Unrecovered Read Error Imgburn log: I 11:39:40 ImgBurn Version 2.3.2.0 started!I 11:39:40 Microsoft Windows 2000 Server (5.0, Build 2195 : Service Pack 4)I 11:39:40 Total Physical Memory: 1,041,320 KB - Available: 689,196 KBI 11:39:40 Initialising SPTI...I 11:39:40 Searching for SCSI / ATAPI devices...I 11:39:50 Found 1 DVD
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 It's burning just fine. The problem is reading the data afterwards. Please get some decent media like Taiyo Yuden or Verbatim and try again. Almost everything else, including the disks you are using, is rubbish.
jkessels Posted May 31, 2007 Author Posted May 31, 2007 The exact same media and hardware work perfectly for video, so it cannot be the media. And the data dvd's cannot be read in other machines, so again it cannot be the media. And Philips, Sony, and NEC are excellent brands. The only thing that is rubbish is your answer, you snob.
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 You really are a fuckwit. Alot of Sony media, including the crap you are using, has been outsourced to a company in Singapore. The media is shit. Sony Japan media is "Class A" media. Yours isn't. You'll get the same answer in every forum you visit. It would seem, however, that you've neither the fucking brains nor the wit to recognise an honest answer when you see one. Now, kindly fuck off.
LOCOENG Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 I tend to agree with everything Shamus said except the NEC drive I believe to be quite good....the only intelligent choice made it seems.
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 Actually, I didn't say anything about the NEC drive - which I believe is quite good.
jkessels Posted May 31, 2007 Author Posted May 31, 2007 I take exception to your abusive language and have reported you to the admin of this forum.
LOCOENG Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 I must have misread...you did say Almost everything else... please excuse me while I go fuck off.
LOCOENG Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 I take exception to your abusive language and have reported you to the admin of this forum. That's rich....mwahahaha
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 I take exception to your abusive language and have reported you to the admin of this forum. Good for you, idiot. It'll probably come as a shock to be told to fuck off a second time then.
LIGHTNING UK! Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 The content of the image you're burning shouldn't even come into it. If the drive says it can't read a specific sector, it can't read a specific sector. Nothing I can do or say will change that. What you have here is a hardware issue - or if it's software, it's something working at a lower level than ImgBurn, making it seem like a hardware issue. As for reporting Shamus.... You started it by calling him a 'snob'. Don't give it out if you can't take it back.
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted June 1, 2007 Posted June 1, 2007 I 12:05:12 Image File: E:\New\vista\np-mvuo64.iso Yo-ho. Yo-ho. http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&...earch&meta=
LOCOENG Posted June 1, 2007 Posted June 1, 2007 I was looking at that too, but I was too lazy to actually google it.
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted June 1, 2007 Posted June 1, 2007 I was looking at that too, but I was too lazy to actually google it. That's why I like Mozilla/Firefox. It's got one of those double-click to highlight and right-click to search Google thingies installed.
Recommended Posts