Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
try a discovery image and see if they give the same result

 

now what would that have to do with the price of tea in china?

Posted
Source File Size: 4.707.319.808 bytes

 

other than the expected slope in the PIE's and a bad clump in the middle of the PIF's, I don't see any change from 4400 to a full disk

 

feb174ah.png]My Webpage[/url]

Posted
now what would that have to do with the price of tea in china?

 

Now one could say that about some of your posts! =))

 

I can't speak for corny, but lfc and I got ours from SVP.

 

The spindles I've got certainly look official, they even have a nice bit of paper on top of the first disc giving warnings about only using them in drives that comply with the new dvd-r specs for burning 16x media.

 

It then goes on to say that they're made in Japan.

Posted

looking back over the scans, it seems an issue more with the nec 4550/1

drives than any media inconsistency for file size burn, except for the overspeed with the nec 3500.

Posted
I can't speak for corny,...from SVP.

 

you can :P

 

@ chewy , that could have been a one off not so good disc, my 3500 usually burns these well

i will sacrifice another if you wish?

Posted
@ chewy , that could have been a one off not so good disc, my 3500 usually burns these well

i will sacrifice another if you wish?

 

No, don't waste another, but what led you to say that about the file size?

Posted

Probably exactly what you showed in your pic earlier - that the scan gets worse at the end. So if you cut the burn short, you don't get to see all tha bad bits. Pretty obvious stuff really!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.