chewy Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 where in the heck are they coming from? Mine are much more consistent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornholio7 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 try a discovery image and see if they give the same result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chewy Posted February 17, 2006 Author Share Posted February 17, 2006 try a discovery image and see if they give the same result now what would that have to do with the price of tea in china? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornholio7 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 Source File Size: 4.707.319.808 bytes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chewy Posted February 17, 2006 Author Share Posted February 17, 2006 Source File Size: 4.707.319.808 bytes other than the expected slope in the PIE's and a bad clump in the middle of the PIF's, I don't see any change from 4400 to a full disk ]My Webpage[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIGHTNING UK! Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 now what would that have to do with the price of tea in china? Now one could say that about some of your posts! I can't speak for corny, but lfc and I got ours from SVP. The spindles I've got certainly look official, they even have a nice bit of paper on top of the first disc giving warnings about only using them in drives that comply with the new dvd-r specs for burning 16x media. It then goes on to say that they're made in Japan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chewy Posted February 17, 2006 Author Share Posted February 17, 2006 looking back over the scans, it seems an issue more with the nec 4550/1 drives than any media inconsistency for file size burn, except for the overspeed with the nec 3500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cornholio7 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I can't speak for corny,...from SVP. you can @ chewy , that could have been a one off not so good disc, my 3500 usually burns these well i will sacrifice another if you wish? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chewy Posted February 17, 2006 Author Share Posted February 17, 2006 @ chewy , that could have been a one off not so good disc, my 3500 usually burns these welli will sacrifice another if you wish? No, don't waste another, but what led you to say that about the file size? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIGHTNING UK! Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 Probably exactly what you showed in your pic earlier - that the scan gets worse at the end. So if you cut the burn short, you don't get to see all tha bad bits. Pretty obvious stuff really! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts