Defenestration Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 Both these points are very picky so feel free to ignore them, but I thought I'd point them out anyway. 1) The Check for Program Update drop-down combo has the options in the following order Never, Daily, Fornightly, Weekly, Monthly. Weekly and Fortnightly could be switched round. 2) I didn't think I'd see it due to the response I got when I posted about it, but thanks for implementing the new %B Filename field specifier for the Graph Data filename! The Legend on the right says "%B - Date (YYYY/MM/DD)", but the date's actually inserted as YYYY-MM-DD, so maybe the legend text could be changed to what's actually inserted. BTW LUK, what registry keys/values do I need to add to start playing with the thread priorities, and what are the defaults ?
LIGHTNING UK! Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 1. God knows how that happened, I must have been asleep. 2. The '/' is used when building the date, only it's actually replaced with whatever date seperator your OS is set to use. The thing is, it then replaces certain characters that aren't allowed in path / filenames. To do it properly I'd actually have to build that text up on the fly inserting the correct date seperator and then replacing with '_' if I needed to. All that is just a little bit overkill. All threads default to 'normal' priority but the app itself switches to 'high' when burning. To override them, use the following keys: OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_Build OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_BuildRead OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_Burn OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_DeviceBuffer OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_GraphData OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_Read OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_Verify They're all DWORD type values. 0 = idle, 1 = lowest, 2 = lower, 3 = normal, 4 = higher, 5 = highest, 6 = time critical, everything else = normal.
Defenestration Posted September 12, 2006 Author Posted September 12, 2006 All that is just a little bit overkill.I agree. All threads default to 'normal' priority but the app itself switches to 'high' when burning. To override them, use the following keys: OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_Build OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_BuildRead OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_Burn OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_DeviceBuffer OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_GraphData OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_Read OVERRIDE_ThreadPriority_Verify They're all DWORD type values. 0 = idle, 1 = lowest, 2 = lower, 3 = normal, 4 = higher, 5 = highest, 6 = time critical, everything else = normal. Time to get testing
LIGHTNING UK! Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 Just as a heads up, the back end code is right for the program update time periods but the visual side of things (in that combobox) is wrong. So basically if you select fortnightly it'll check weekly and if you select weekly it'll check fortnightly.
scuzzy Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Just another extremely minor cosmetic issue with 2.1 : In "Tools | Settings | Events", shouldn't "Append Existing" and "Overwrite Existing" be radio buttons, rather than mutually exclusive checkboxes ? Not that I really mind - it works very well as it is - but radio buttons would be more "standard". Tip o' the hat anyway
LIGHTNING UK! Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 It wouldn't work like that. Although the options are mutually exclusive, it's also possible to not have either of them checked. With radio buttons, 1 of them always is.
scuzzy Posted November 15, 2006 Posted November 15, 2006 Although the options are mutually exclusive, it's also possible to not have either of them checked. Ah ... point taken. I hadn't tried unchecking the checked option as opposed to just checking the other one. Although ...... what does it actually mean to have neither one checked ? "Create a new log with a different name" ?
LIGHTNING UK! Posted November 15, 2006 Posted November 15, 2006 Yes, and before you ask, no I won't just create a 3rd radiobutton You should notice that the log and queue options looks the same.... it's all about consistency
dbminter Posted November 16, 2006 Posted November 16, 2006 Yes, and before you ask, no I won't just create a 3rd radiobutton CHEEKY!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now