Jump to content

volvofl10

Beta Team Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,762

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by volvofl10

    just a typo

    in ImgBurn Bugs

    Posted

    that's not how I envisaged it when I typed it.

    I'm sure you meant "envisioned" there :whistling:

     

    I'm sure you meant "envisioned" there

    FFS ............ give me a break doods buddies forum members ! ,at least ues words that "I" can spill will yoo :teehee:

     

    MESSAGE FROM : the ImgBurn support forum ECO friendly dept

    use short words to preserve key strokes on keyboards. this cuts down on energy waste and besides , it takes 12,000 years for a plastic keyboard to degrade to nothing after disposal and volvo can understand whats going on

    Dead drives.

    in ImgBurn Support

    Posted

    W 23:02:02 Failed to Write Sectors 448 - 479 - The semaphore timeout period has expired.

     

    semaphore time outs are usually caused by the chip in the external case. Its possible the actuyal drive is OK, just the case its in needs changing.

    a search on "semaphore timeout" might show which case's are the ones to avoid

    A few questions

    in ImgBurn Support

    Posted

    your right with what your thinking. It is most likely the discs your using.

    Try using Verbatim (made in singapore) 2.4x, these seem to be the most stable dual layer discs on the market right now, which is why we always recomend them

     

    you could try reducing the speed with the ritek ones you have to 2.4x , but chances are they will still fail.

     

    EDUT , Im to slow at typing :thumbup:

    Noob help!

    in ImgBurn Support

    Posted

    The log file is as follows:

     

    ; //****************************************\\

    ; ImgBurn Version 2.3.2.0 - Log

    ; Saturday, 01 March 2008, 18:27:53

    ; \\****************************************//

    ;

    ;

    I 18:18:44 ImgBurn Version 2.3.2.0 started!

     

    update to version 2.4.0.0 as well

    This program is SICK!!!!!

    in ImgBurn Suggestions

    Posted

    this has been mentioned many times before.............. and you get the same answer as well

     

    you need a reeeeally top end system to be able to do multiple burns at the same time . the chances of the average user having such system is highly unlikely .

     

    your likely to get I/O errors as well if using 1 hdd to feed more than 1 optical drive at a time, so its not a thing we would recommend doing I'm afraid, and is unlikely to be implemented

     

    next time you do multiple burns with the software you mentioned, watch the "actual" time it takes on a clock ( not what *spit* nero tells you on screen ). if memory serve me right I think its been mentioned before that multiple burns took twice as long when using 2 optical drives burning at the same time than doing 2 separate burns one after the other on the same burner

     

    Let's see here. I got my MCSE in Windows 2003 server and my ACT certification. I've been working on PC's, building and repairing networks for over 17 years. Like I said before. I burn a lot of dvd's. My 3 computers have 4 dvd burner drives installed on them. I don't get any I/O errors while burning. If your dvd drives are running the latest firmware, your computer is running a lot of ram (2 gigs or more) and if your pc is configured properly; you should not have really no problems burning multiple dvd's. This is the new age, people are doing more things with their computers. We have Duo core processors and the Quad cores are comming out. So running multiple dvd drives shouldn't be a problem. Us advance users need to be heard too. Everything shouldn't just be for the novice users especially if you are taking donations. IMGBURN is a dvd burning software. It just doesn't make since for it to only be allowed to use only 1 dvd while burning. But, I understand. You guys just want to take the easy way out and just stick with single dvd burning. Like you said this has been requested many times before, so why can't we have it. :blink:

    I DO like clever replies :rolleyes:

    didnt i already say "you need a reeeeally top end system to be able to do multiple burns at the same time" ?

     

    try using 3 or 4 burners from 1 HDD with nero or alcohol , AND as i said earlier (as well) watch the actual time on a clock and dont beleive everything nero tells you , but then you already knew that given your qualifications in computing.

    Loved your sarcasm about us wanting the easy way out and sticking with single disc burning though :thumbup: , so you wont be offended when i tell you the programs name is ImgBurn and not ImgsBurns which would then indicate it does multiple burning :thumbup:

     

    the point you made (that by the way backfires on you) is that ImgBurn is donationware and not "pay for" like Nero and Alcohol . Its not made for anyone in paticular ie novices,professionals ect ect ( where you wrongly assumed it was for novices only).

    The object of LUK was to keep it simple and easy to use out of the box so to speak. All suggestions are taken on oard and LUK considers wether to implement them or not . The answer i gave you is the answer given out on previous occasions when people asked the question you asked. ( a search would of revealed this to you) but you "ADVANCED" ( your words not mine) wouldnt know that .

     

    Oh, and i almost forgot , im running a quadcore, 3gb ram with 2 sataII drives and 3 burners ( 2 sata), and i cant burn 3 seperate named DVD's at the same time successfully, so your theory on the specs of a PC are a bit behind the times

    so when you as an "Advanced" users get an upto date machine ( duo or quadcore)tell me how to do it with nero :rolleyes: untill then I'll just use the que Que feature in ImgBurn rather than screw up 2/3/4 discs at a time trying to multiple burns

    regards

    This program is SICK!!!!!

    in ImgBurn Suggestions

    Posted

    this has been mentioned many times before.............. and you get the same answer as well

     

    you need a reeeeally top end system to be able to do multiple burns at the same time . the chances of the average user having such system is highly unlikely .

     

    your likely to get I/O errors as well if using 1 hdd to feed more than 1 optical drive at a time, so its not a thing we would recommend doing I'm afraid, and is unlikely to be implemented

     

    next time you do multiple burns with the software you mentioned, watch the "actual" time it takes on a clock ( not what *spit* nero tells you on screen ). if memory serve me right I think its been mentioned before that multiple burns took twice as long when using 2 optical drives burning at the same time than doing 2 separate burns one after the other on the same burner

    Happy Birthday blutach!

    in Chat

    Posted

    as above, im 50 minutes early , but as you lot in Oz sleep at strange hours , better early than late

     

    :happybday::happybday::happybday:

     

    but then as your 12 hours ahead i spose im 12 hours late with it and not early :rolleyes:

     

    Have a good one Blu

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept