![](https://forum.imgburn.com/uploads/set_resources_1/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
volvofl10
-
Posts
1,762 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by volvofl10
-
-
that's not how I envisaged it when I typed it.
I'm sure you meant "envisioned" there
I'm sure you meant "envisioned" thereFFS ............ give me a break doods buddies forum members ! ,at least ues words that "I" can spill will yoo
MESSAGE FROM : the ImgBurn support forum ECO friendly dept
use short words to preserve key strokes on keyboards. this cuts down on energy waste and besides , it takes 12,000 years for a plastic keyboard to degrade to nothing after disposal and volvo can understand whats going on
-
its all well and good, but the original way of getting the boats from 1 level to the other was better.
-
W 23:02:02 Failed to Write Sectors 448 - 479 - The semaphore timeout period has expired.
semaphore time outs are usually caused by the chip in the external case. Its possible the actuyal drive is OK, just the case its in needs changing.
a search on "semaphore timeout" might show which case's are the ones to avoid
-
AWESOME dood
-
BWA HA HA HA , nice one Donta
-
windscreen = windshield , now THAT cant be a typo...................... can it ?
for "proper" typo's just read any of my posts
-
Thanks everyone
its been a not to bad day ( still had to go to work) . would love to go on the lash tonight, but work early tomorrow rules that one out
-
your right with what your thinking. It is most likely the discs your using.
Try using Verbatim (made in singapore) 2.4x, these seem to be the most stable dual layer discs on the market right now, which is why we always recomend them
you could try reducing the speed with the ritek ones you have to 2.4x , but chances are they will still fail.
EDUT , Im to slow at typing
-
how old is the drive ? is it still under warranty/guarantee
-
The log file is as follows:
; //****************************************\\
; ImgBurn Version 2.3.2.0 - Log
; Saturday, 01 March 2008, 18:27:53
; \\****************************************//
;
;
I 18:18:44 ImgBurn Version 2.3.2.0 started!
update to version 2.4.0.0 as well
-
this has been mentioned many times before.............. and you get the same answer as well
you need a reeeeally top end system to be able to do multiple burns at the same time . the chances of the average user having such system is highly unlikely .
your likely to get I/O errors as well if using 1 hdd to feed more than 1 optical drive at a time, so its not a thing we would recommend doing I'm afraid, and is unlikely to be implemented
next time you do multiple burns with the software you mentioned, watch the "actual" time it takes on a clock ( not what *spit* nero tells you on screen ). if memory serve me right I think its been mentioned before that multiple burns took twice as long when using 2 optical drives burning at the same time than doing 2 separate burns one after the other on the same burner
Let's see here. I got my MCSE in Windows 2003 server and my ACT certification. I've been working on PC's, building and repairing networks for over 17 years. Like I said before. I burn a lot of dvd's. My 3 computers have 4 dvd burner drives installed on them. I don't get any I/O errors while burning. If your dvd drives are running the latest firmware, your computer is running a lot of ram (2 gigs or more) and if your pc is configured properly; you should not have really no problems burning multiple dvd's. This is the new age, people are doing more things with their computers. We have Duo core processors and the Quad cores are comming out. So running multiple dvd drives shouldn't be a problem. Us advance users need to be heard too. Everything shouldn't just be for the novice users especially if you are taking donations. IMGBURN is a dvd burning software. It just doesn't make since for it to only be allowed to use only 1 dvd while burning. But, I understand. You guys just want to take the easy way out and just stick with single dvd burning. Like you said this has been requested many times before, so why can't we have it.
I DO like clever replies
didnt i already say "you need a reeeeally top end system to be able to do multiple burns at the same time" ?
try using 3 or 4 burners from 1 HDD with nero or alcohol , AND as i said earlier (as well) watch the actual time on a clock and dont beleive everything nero tells you , but then you already knew that given your qualifications in computing.
Loved your sarcasm about us wanting the easy way out and sticking with single disc burning though
, so you wont be offended when i tell you the programs name is ImgBurn and not ImgsBurns which would then indicate it does multiple burning
the point you made (that by the way backfires on you) is that ImgBurn is donationware and not "pay for" like Nero and Alcohol . Its not made for anyone in paticular ie novices,professionals ect ect ( where you wrongly assumed it was for novices only).
The object of LUK was to keep it simple and easy to use out of the box so to speak. All suggestions are taken on oard and LUK considers wether to implement them or not . The answer i gave you is the answer given out on previous occasions when people asked the question you asked. ( a search would of revealed this to you) but you "ADVANCED" ( your words not mine) wouldnt know that .
Oh, and i almost forgot , im running a quadcore, 3gb ram with 2 sataII drives and 3 burners ( 2 sata), and i cant burn 3 seperate named DVD's at the same time successfully, so your theory on the specs of a PC are a bit behind the times
so when you as an "Advanced" users get an upto date machine ( duo or quadcore)tell me how to do it with nero
untill then I'll just use the que Que feature in ImgBurn rather than screw up 2/3/4 discs at a time trying to multiple burns
regards
-
posting a log file might help us to help you
-
this has been mentioned many times before.............. and you get the same answer as well
you need a reeeeally top end system to be able to do multiple burns at the same time . the chances of the average user having such system is highly unlikely .
your likely to get I/O errors as well if using 1 hdd to feed more than 1 optical drive at a time, so its not a thing we would recommend doing I'm afraid, and is unlikely to be implemented
next time you do multiple burns with the software you mentioned, watch the "actual" time it takes on a clock ( not what *spit* nero tells you on screen ). if memory serve me right I think its been mentioned before that multiple burns took twice as long when using 2 optical drives burning at the same time than doing 2 separate burns one after the other on the same burner
-
without even reading the links posted above, i can tell you from experience that panasonic are notoriously picky about what discs they will play
-
as above, im 50 minutes early , but as you lot in Oz sleep at strange hours , better early than late
but then as your 12 hours ahead i spose im 12 hours late with it and not early
Have a good one Blu
-
i guess i have to ask why you would even want to ?
-
< goes and stands in the corner to look at the wall >
volvo throws a brick at hibbysam, "Hey hiby, Loco's talking to you, turn round'
-
Kabster
see post #4 further up this page
-
:happybday:
Your probably out on the piss by now, but Have a Great One
Happy Birthday lmao2k
-
I was at DisneyWorld,
thats no excuse
-
kin hell , yet another one i missed
a Happy belated Birthday Jill
-
Not as late as my wishes for you for a great Birthday
-
Special 'Thanks' to all the beta testers. I don't think we'll beat '49' any time soon
Does this mean I can delete the previous 526 versions of ImgBurn now?
NO
, get another 500gig hdd for the next version
-
Ahha , so jason is banging his own drum is he ?? better than next doors wife i suppose ? /me wonders if she blew his own trumpet
just a typo
in ImgBurn Bugs
Posted