Jump to content

dbminter

Beta Team Members
  • Posts

    8,405
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dbminter

  1. Are you sure RetroArch plays audio CD's? The only two hits I found for RetroArch aren't for playing audio CD's. One for a video game emulator and one for the API that runs the emulator. It sounds like RetroArch is only for playing game CD's.
  2. What program is this? I'm not aware of any application that can read BIN/CUE files natively and play them. I know DVDShrink can read in ISO's of DVD Video movies to process. And I think Media Player Classic Home Cinema can play DVD Video ISO's natively. But, as I said, those aren't audio CD image files.
  3. BIN doesn't work that way, as far as I know. BIN is for entire disc images. What you probably want to is to create a container file by Ripping the individual tracks in Windows Media Player. Or you could install VirtualClone Drive. It will mount .CCD files that ImgBurn, I think, creates along with BIN/CUE.
  4. You might have luck installing the free version of Alcohol 120%. I thought it had some kind of capability to image such discs. Maybe that's only in the paid version. Maybe I'm completely wrong; who knows?
  5. The write speed you get out of a burn is down to a few factors. So, even if you have Max set, you may not get the highest rated speed you expect every time. Every burn, it's really down to simply what the drive does. The slower you write any burn, the better likelihood it won't encounter issues. So, if you want to set each burn to just 2x, it is something to try. In fact, sometimes, troubleshooting advice is given to write at a slower rate to see if that helps solve the problem. Near as I can remember to what I was told about the TOC, the TOC is not written to the same place each time. That there is no set "logic" to where the TOC goes. About writing to the edge of the disc, I still believe it's down to a combination of the burner and the media. For instance, I've written several 24.9 GB images to Verbatim BD-R in my Pioneer BDR-209 and BDR-2209 without issue.
  6. If the drive is making those kinds of noises, then the drive could be scratching up media. You may want to, if you can remember, do a thorough check on the bottom on a BD-R before burning it. That way if you get scratches on it after the burn, you know it's the drive doing it. The only thing I could see making a scratch like that is if there's some kind of imperfection or raised area in the tray. When the drive spins the disc, it would be scratching against the drive tray. The laser can't be making them and the internals of the drive only ever touch the hole in the center. So, it must be something in the tray indentation itself. Supposedly, BD media is "scratch proof." I mean, if you took a pair of scissors, yes, you could scratch the bottom surface. However, relative to DVD bottoms, they are "scratch proof." Which is why you should be checking the media before you burn it. You want to make sure the discs didn't come out of the factory with scratches throughout the entire spindle.
  7. It's possible the disc may have been scratched out of the factory. The drive may not have done it. I encountered one back in January that failed to Verify. When I examined the BD-R in the light, I noticed it was cracked all the way down the radius. Must have come out of the factory that way. Why it didn't fail during burning, I can't explain.
  8. Ah, that's a shame. I remember 22 years ago, mIRC used to queue an entire log before writing it to disk after the chat window was closed. Unfortunately, the application would frequently crash when the log size reached a certain limit, losing the log. It eventually was changed to write each line of the chat window to the log on disc after it was sent. This prevented the loss of chat logs.
  9. Ah, then might i again suggest that each line be written to the log on disk as it's generated in case someone does have to terminate the application? I suggested this because someone else posted a problem where they couldn't post a log because they had to terminate a locked up ImgBurn.
  10. I spoke from over 10 years of experience with LG. The old joke is LG stands for Lucky Good in that it's Lucky Good if it works right. I've had multiple copies of the WH16NS40 and they all had the same problems. They will fail 9 times out of 10 to Verify writes to BD-R and RE DL. They only write BD-RE at 1x for 2x media. It will always write corrupt data to the 2nd layer of BD-RE DL when formatted as a giant floppy. When writing to BD-R and you experience a write rate drop, the maximum it will resume writing is 6x. When writing to Ritek 8x DVD+RW, it will complete Verify even if the data is corrupt when you try to access it. The first LG drive I had was a rebranded DVD burner from IOMega. I quickly got rid of it because it would 50/50 write DVD Video discs that played back with skips and pops in the video. I only used an LG drive at all because it was the only internal BD drive that was writing to 8x DVD+RW after Pioneer borked the 1.34 firmware. I wouldn't have used it otherwise, and when Pioneer fixed the problem with their 1.50 firmware, I quickly removed the LG (It had stopped writing to DVD-R, anyway.) and replaced it with a Pioneer 209. There was also someone else who reported problems with that LG drive writing to BD DL media. After they replaced the LG with a Pioneer 2209, the problem went away. So, my experience with LG has left me with a bad taste in my mouth about their WH16NS40 BD drive. Much prefer Pioneer's 209 and 2209 BD drives. As for DVDInfo Pro, something is causing the drive to return the disc is smaller than it should be. That would be either the drive, the disc, or DVDInfo Pro, or a combination of those things.
  11. Every time ImgBurn generates a line in the log, does it write the log to the disc each time? Or does it queue the entire log until the operation is completed and then the log file is written to disc? If it writes the log only after an operation is completed, might I suggest that ImgBurn write to the log file each time it generates an output message? That way, if an operation fails due to a command that never completes, the log can still be viewable.
  12. So, you have successfully burned these Ritek BD-R before? Just that you burned less than 99% of the total available disc space? It seems you're using an LG BD burner. I'd still say that LG drive probably doesn't like Ritek BD media very well. LG's, I know, are absolutely useless for writing BD DL media, so it wouldn't surprise me if it can't write 100% of the available space on a disc. Particularly a Ritek one. As I said, before I laid the entire blame on the Ritek's, I'd try some Verbatim's and see if you can write to the edge of those. It may just be that Ritek discs are pretty bad and that quality Verbatim media might solve the issue. Or the LG drive may just be pretty rotten and can't write to the very edge of any BD-R media.
  13. Probably the drive doesn't like the Ritek BD-R you're using. Ritek is a 2nd tier optical disc manufacturer. Have you used these discs with any frequency before and they worked out okay? I'd recommend trying Verbatim BD-R and see if that can be written to to the edge. I know the Pioneer 209 and 2209 will write Verbatim BD-R at almost to the edge, just a shade under 25 GB.
  14. What are the contents of this disc? If it's not a bootable disc, i.e. just a disc of some contents that aren't made in any fancy way, you could try just creating a new ISO in ImgBurn Build mode. See if that ISO mounts. Of course, this doesn't solve why Windows won't mount that ISO. But, you could spend the rest of your life trying to debug a Windows issue and get nowhere. It's the nature of the Windows beast. When something goes wrong with an internal Windows function, too often than not, the only solution is to restore Windows from an image where it worked before/reinstall Windows. However, it's probably just a case of a weird ISO that isn't mounting correctly as you said another image does work. Probably something wrong/weird with the source disc that is creating a weird ISO.
  15. Yeah, you probably just had a random fluke where one worked. Even crap media will, on occasion, succeed every once in a while. If those discs don't work on both firmware revisions, the problem is either the drive or the discs. And Ritek is a 2nd tier disc manufacturer. And you should never go for Ritek for double layer media. Verbatim, pretty much, makes the only good DVD+R DL discs, so they probably make the only good BD DL media. I only use their BD-RE DL and sometimes TDK made Verbatim's BD-RE DL, which I've also used successfully. I recommend reflashing that drive back to 1.50. There was a bork in the firmware with 1.34 involving Ritek 8x DVD+RW discs not writing correctly, always failing Verify, that Pioneer fixed with 1.50. So, who knows what else they fixed? Of course, who knows what else they might have broke?! I wrote to Pioneer nearly 2 years ago about that DVD+RW issue, but never expected anymore firmware updates to the drive after almost 2 years. Color me surprised when it came out on the 2nd of March!
  16. If you're adventurous, you could try reverting the Pioneer firmware from 1.50 to 1.34 with DVRTool. See what I did here: http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?/topic/24254-random-trouble-with-bd-writeverify/ However, be aware that my experience with DVRTool works with the Pioneer BD-2209 drive. It may not work with your drive.
  17. Yes, under what context do you mean that BDMV folders will write? Are you writing them to ISO first and burning them or using the on the fly build? Or using some other program entirely to write these folders to discs?
  18. I encountered a similar problem. I got a 209 to supplement my 2209 from Pioneer. I put the 209 in my enclosure to test it before installing it internally, which was its target destination. I updated the firmware to 1.50 from 1.34. I tried burning a Verbatim BD-R SL, but at 70% into it, the write rate dropped to 0.0x and never resumed. The drive light was off but the enclosure light was flashing. Had to power off the enclosure and had a coaster. I tried a DVD+RW and the same thing happened at 97% into Verify. I installed the drive internally in case it might be the enclosure or a conflict with the enclosure and the 209. The 2209 was no problem back in January with this same enclosure. The drive works fine installed internally, it seems, so it must be either the enclosure or an incompatibility between the enclosure and the 209. This doesn't appear to be your problem because the screen shot seems to indicate your drive is installed as SATA, which is internally installed.
  19. Booting into Safe Mode would be my next troubleshooting suggestion, too. You can then see if it's something in your Windows installation that might be causing the problem. As LUK said, some kind of software interference, like antivirus. It could be the drive needs replacing. I'd also see about getting an enclosure and putting the drive in that and testing and see if you still get that or other errors. However, an enclosure isn't necessarily a viable idea. I put my new Pioneer 209 BD in one and was getting weird errors where Writes and Verifies would drop to 0.0x and never resume. So, I installed the drive internally, since that was always its intended target. It worked. So, either my enclosure has died after just 2 months or there's an incompatibility between the 209 and the enclosure. Swapping out the drive would also verify if the drive is the problem or some kind of software interference or a different hardware error. However, of course, any swapping out of drives for other drives or putting them in an enclosure requires work and sufficient knowledge in cracking open the PC case.
  20. Oh, wait, there was a log attached! My bad!
  21. I've been collecting all kinds of things that have been accruing over the past 26 years. I even still have my FORTRAN projects back when I was taught it in college. No one uses FORTRAN anymore, even back when I was taught it. And I haven't touched FORTRAN since 1995, but I've kept all the programs I wrote during college.
  22. ImgBurn will burn BDMV folders. What happens exactly when you try to burn BDMV folders? Do you get the same error? As to the nature of the error, I can see a few potential things. How old this drive? The Pioneer 208, I think, is a pretty old BD burner. The drive might have simply come to the end of its life cycle. I see you were using Ricoh media. Have you always used this Ricoh media before? It may be your drive doesn't like that particular Disc ID. Are you burning this ISO to DVD or BD media? Ricoh media can be pretty iffy for some drives. It's a generally lower tier quality media. If it's a DVD disc, try using Verbatim DataLife Plus media, which you can only find online. NOT the Life Media series you find in stores. If it's BD, try Verbatim BD if you haven't already. Unless it's BD-RE SL. Don't use Verbatim BD-RE SL. Try updating the firmware of this drive. Pioneer recently released the 1.50 branch of its current and older BD drives after more than a year of no updates. That might help. You should do it anyway even if it doesn't. In Write mode, right click on the drop down list of target drives and choose the option to Check for firmware updates. Post the entire log of this failed burn, not just the error screen that pops up. Help --> ImgBurn Logs
  23. I said abandoned because I haven't seen a THUMBS.DB file in a folder except for 10 year plus old backups of folders I did. Restoring them restored the THUMBS.DB that was backed up with the folders back with Windows Vista. I haven't seen a "live" THUMBS.DB file in any folder on any Windows installation I've had since Vista. Except for, as I said, deprecated contents. So, I just guessed it was abandoned. I looked it up. It seems that THUMBS.DB did make it all the way to Windows 8, but doesn't seem to be live anymore in Windows 10.
  24. Actually, firmware 1.50 might improve the results of your issue. I checked the release notes for 1.50. They say these improvements were made to the firmware: Improvement of the recording quality with BD-R TL(2x 4x 6x : MCM) Performance improvement during high-speed rotation Improvement of the operational stability when recording DVD-RAM That first line is of importance here. However, it seems to indicate MCM BD-R TL discs. However, MCM makes Verbatim's DVD-R and DVD+R DL. Don't know if they make Milleniata's Verbatim M-Disc BD-R TL or not. Though, it seems you'd have a higher possible success rate with BD-R TL under this 1.50 firmware. It's definitely something worth investigating if you wanted to invest the time and money.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.