FireStarter Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Under the tab Labels I can create data for the Volume Identifiers: System Volume Set Publisher Data Preparer Application I am trying to retrieve that information after burning a media. Not much success since i do not find a tool to read these identifiers. Even ImgBurn doesn't seem to show them in read mode. PlexTools is showing at least the Publisher entry. But thats it. How do I retrieve these data again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIGHTNING UK! Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 ImgBurn displays a few more in the tooltip that comes up when you hover over the 'Label' field in the 'Source' box within Read mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireStarter Posted December 10, 2012 Author Share Posted December 10, 2012 I read this before but no 'hint' is shown above the 'Label'-label. I get a hint only for 'Imp ID:' and 'File Sys:' Edit: Oh - I see - It is not the label named 'Label:' but the disc specific label. I am pretty sure that i used the 'System Identifier' - but there us written 'Unknown'. I have to do some tests again. Is there a way to retrieve these data not only visible in a hint but also able to copy them somewhere? (commandline or something similar?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireStarter Posted December 10, 2012 Author Share Posted December 10, 2012 I tested again - in the log file is written: I 11:41:29 Operation Started!I 11:41:30 Source Device: [0:2:0] PLEXTOR BD-R PX-LB950SA 1.06 (Y:) (ATAPI) I 11:41:30 Source Media Type: DVD-RW (Book Type: DVD-RW) (Disc ID: MCC 01RW4X) I 11:41:30 Source Media Supported Write Speeds: 4x I 11:41:30 Image File: -==/\/[bUILD IMAGE]\/\==- I 11:41:30 Image File Sectors: 238.704 (MODE1/2048) I 11:41:30 Image File Size: 488.865.792 bytes I 11:41:30 Image File Volume Identifier: UNDEFINED I 11:41:30 Image File Volume Set Identifier: 418A5C9C0003A430 I 11:41:30 Image File Application Identifier: Test_Application I 11:41:30 Image File Implementation Identifier: ImgBurn I 11:41:30 Image File File System(s): UDF (2.50) I set all 5 volume identifiers. The hint is showing me only 'Test_Application' - all the others are 'unknown'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIGHTNING UK! Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Some fields may not apply to the file system(s) you've got on the disc. No, there's no way in ImgBurn to extract that info from the disc - via command line or otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireStarter Posted December 10, 2012 Author Share Posted December 10, 2012 Some fields may not apply to the file system(s) you've got on the disc So it depends also on the file system of the disc? Since I know that while testing yesterday I could retrieve the publisher string with PlexTools but today it was empty. (both times it was a DVD-RW). If i see something like I 11:41:30 Image File Application Identifier: Test_Application in the log file can I be sure that it was written to the disc (since the program know which data is fitting to the used file format) or does it only mean that ImgBurn tried to write it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireStarter Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share Posted December 11, 2012 I burnt a DVD (UDF 2.50) and was setting for all 5 entries the string 'Plextor PX-LB950SA 1.07 4x' Only the application Volume Identifier was written. And altough ImgBurn tells me that i can use 128 chars only ''Plextor PX-LB950SA 1.07' was written (perhaps still one space more). When I try to write '4x Plextor PX-LB950SA 1.07' then '4x Plextor PX-LB950SA 1' is written. Is it limited to 23 chars or is this a bug? And if it is limited to 23 why ImgBurn tells me x/128 chars used? In the log file the '4x' at the end of the string was not mentioned. So I assume, that ImgBurn removed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIGHTNING UK! Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 The fields are just set to allow a max length of 128 as that's what ISO9660 supports. File systems that have lower string length limits just use a truncated version of the string - so yeah, that's 64 for Joliet (Unicode version of ISO9660) and 23 for UDF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertEinstein Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 I think your software got the fields backwards. I read in the UDF standard that the 'Volume Identifier' has a maximum length of 32 characters and it's actually the 'Volume Set Identifier' that get's the recommended maximum length of 128 characters. Not that this matters all that much to me. Because I would rather get 128 characters for the 'Volume Identifier' as I never even really use the 'Volume Set Identifier' when authoring my discs. It's just something I realized today when reading over the standard. Your software has the names backwards but that's a good thing. Anyhoo, looking forward to the next release of this software, if it ever happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIGHTNING UK! Posted June 25, 2023 Share Posted June 25, 2023 You think wrong Yes, the 'volume identifier' in the PVD is only 32 bytes, but that isn't the one any implementation reads from. The ones that get read are the (logical) volume identifier's in the LVD and FSD. They're 128 bytes. Sometimes it's possible to be too exact with the naming of things in a gui (when using naming from a spec) and so I opted to drop the 'logical' from the name, leaving us with 'Volume Identifier'. Volume set identifier is something totally different. That's 128 bytes too. Read 2.2.2.5 in the UDF 2.50 specs again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertEinstein Posted June 27, 2023 Share Posted June 27, 2023 Well, then why won't Microsoft fix this issue? Why does their crappy File Explorer still only show 32 bytes of data for a Volume label these days? I hate that crap! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts