Shamus_McFartfinger Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/2005/11/De...nnequinRape.htm The period beginning on the Monday before Thanksgiving* up until Christmas, is the peak time for a little reported incidence of mannequin rape, according to disturbing figures that have come into our possession. The attacks, where store mannequins are sexually assaulted, sometimes in the store in front of other shoppers, hit a peak in 2004 with over 4,000 suspected incidents. That number is expected to grow again this year. The combination of mild winters, and increasingly sexy mannequins are to blame for the increase in what is widely regarded as a significantly underreported crime. Mannequin rape may have gone unnoticed for many years as it had been miss-reported under other offenses, such as 'mannequin theft', 'temporarily missing mannequin' or 'unauthorized mannequin moving'. In the case of 'mannequin moving', most stores do not regard it as a police reportable offense if the mannequin is moved less than 3 inches. A store security guard told this web site: "85% of mannequin rapes occur when a mannequin, which is on display near a changing room, is taken into the said changing room and then attacked." 23 November 2005 *Thanksgiving is the fourth Thursday of November.
Jerseyguy Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 could be kirk1701's doing.... making JR jealous?
volvofl10 Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 People who take mannequins into changing rooms and make love to them must be fooking dummys
Grain Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 fooking dummys I wonder how they explain the slivers?
Jerseyguy Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 fooking dummys I wonder how they explain the slivers? guess we will have to wait for Kirk to get back from shopping to find out....
volvofl10 Posted November 24, 2005 Posted November 24, 2005 "fooking dummies" ........... didnt give it a thought when i posted but "Dummies" is an english'ism for mannequins (see here)
dbminter Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 (edited) I think the point being missed here is it's called RAPE! Rape occurs only without the consent of one party. (To Hell with statuatory rape, created only to help line jails and prosecutors lists when it comes election time. ) So, they're saying the mannequins DIDN'T consent to it? Of course not! They're dummies! They can't speak! Or... are they saying... the mannequins DID say no... Edited November 25, 2005 by dbminter
lfcrule1972 Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 I think the REAL point here is that Shamus is blatantly trying to focus our attention away from the practice of Mouse Necrophilia that he encourages in his own home
zacoz Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 Some people here know WAY TOO MUCH information about others. LFC, I didn't think you were supposed to share other people's stories outside the therapy group ?
lfcrule1972 Posted November 25, 2005 Posted November 25, 2005 Its not a secret zacoz - Shamus posted his confession (of sorts ) here: http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?showtopic=215
polopony Posted November 26, 2005 Posted November 26, 2005 I think the REAL point here is that Shamus is blatantly trying to focus our attention away from the practice of Mouse Necrophilia that he encourages in his own home no mention of celery in awhile either ,is he in celery rehab or moved on to another veg and dont know how to break the news ITS OK SHAMUS we're here for you
dbminter Posted November 27, 2005 Posted November 27, 2005 (edited) Mysterious clues have been left behind at the site of all mannequin rapes: 1.) dead mice in traps with evidence of recent post mortem mating 2.) celery stalks inserted into various places carved into the dummies 3.) water wings were attached 4.) copies of Pretty Woman DVD's scattered all over the place 5.) one copy each of #4 were inserted into a pile of dead DVD drives 6.) a bill of sale in the decimal/comma swapped format Police are baffled... some strangely aroused. :& Depending on which type arrived on the scene first, "Wot's all this, then?!" takes on different meaning. Edited November 27, 2005 by dbminter
kirk1701™ Posted November 27, 2005 Posted November 27, 2005 I can see kirk now !!! ha ha it's a good thought but me don't do rape
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted November 28, 2005 Author Posted November 28, 2005 I think the REAL point here is that Shamus is blatantly trying to focus our attention away from the practice of Mouse Necrophilia that he encourages in his own home The photographs prove nothing! I was framed! Framed, I tell ye! *cough*
Shamus_McFartfinger Posted November 28, 2005 Author Posted November 28, 2005 http://seacoastonline.com/news/special/11_27special1.htm New shop's use of live models draws mixed reaction By Associated Press AUGUSTA, Maine - It's downtown Augusta's latest attraction: three young women clad in lingerie who wave to passersby from a store window. The attention-grabbing models were hired by Spellbound, a lingerie store that recently opened on Water Street and is trying to establish its name. The reaction from the public and neighboring business has been mixed. Police have received complaints, and the owner of a business across the road says the women are driving away customers, especially shoppers with children. "It's tainting the wholesome businesses down here," said Carrie Rossignol, co-owner of Video Game Exchange. "I think it's selfish, and I think it's morally reprehensible." Others suggest that the women, who have graced Spellbound's storefront a few days a week since September, bring life and beauty to an often colorless street. "It's like a New York thing. It's urban. It's edgy," said Stacy Gervais, owner of Stacy's Hallmark Store and a founder of a downtown merchants group. "We need a shtick _ something that we do that attracts people and gets us remembered." Spellbound's owner, former Cony High School teacher Felicia Stockford, said she came up with the idea while brainstorming for an inexpensive marketing idea. "I thought, 'You know, that's a big window, and if I put girls in there to wave at traffic, it would draw a lot of attention.'" Paid only in lingerie, the women said they volunteer because they love being seen. "I enjoy it," said Tara Manns, 20. "I enjoy the looks I get." "It's good to get attention once and a while," said Amanda Richards, 21. Accompanied by Jesyka Clark, 18, Manns and Richards stood, kneeled or reclined in the window Friday, flirtatiously cooing and waving at drivers stopped at a red light. "They're exhibitionists," said Stockford, noting that's she's had no trouble finding models for the window. Stockford said the models do not show private parts that would break the law and she forbids the women from striking overly suggestive poses. Police officers have visited the store in response to complaints, but have found nothing illegal, said Lt. Peter Couture. He said there are no state or city laws that prohibit wearing lingerie in public. Information from: Kennebec Journal, http://www.kjonline.com/
LordHeinrich Posted November 28, 2005 Posted November 28, 2005 (edited) It isn't illegal is it??? It's all their fault; dressing so sexy and all. Sometimes it is impossible to resist the temptation!!!! Heck I even bought myself a mannuquin (that wouldn't be considered prostituion will it???), but I am ashamed to admit that I tend to cheat on her... Well, at least I'm not the only one !!! Edited November 28, 2005 by LordHeinrich
zacoz Posted November 28, 2005 Posted November 28, 2005 The photographs prove nothing! I was framed! Framed, I tell ye! *cough* You got a furball there Shamus ???
kirk1701™ Posted November 28, 2005 Posted November 28, 2005 Some people here know WAY TOO MUCH information about others. LFC, I didn't think you were supposed to share other people's stories outside the therapy group ? We got a therapy group WHERE! Yes I need help with JR
lfcrule1972 Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 Bugger there were no pics in that link <sigh>
polopony Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 I was thinking the same thing 3 young models who LIKE to exhibit their wares and no pics :swear:
polopony Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 (edited) www.kennebecjournal.mainetoday.com/news/local/2181015.shtml best I could find Edited November 29, 2005 by polopony
lfcrule1972 Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 Cheers polo - we get the idea now anyways....
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now