Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Wandering Freeloader

File size comparision

Recommended Posts

Just for comparison

 

Nero 8 weight less than 1 GB (of course there is a lot of almost useless software maybe bloatware/crapware)

ImgBurn, well it weight more than 1 500 000 Bytes (and there is only the burning software)

 

Which one suits best your needs... ;)

 

I'm sure every one had made the correct choice, isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You trying to say Nero is smaller than ImgBurn ? Surely that cannot be what you saying (you mean the other way round) yeah.

 

 

I made the right choice in using ImgBurn rather than Nero

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah ImgBurn just rocks

 

But I was astonished when I saw the installation size of Nero 8, of course i dnd't want it . I felt a fair comparison was needed. Anyway I completely assume my words there :P

Edited by Wandering Freeloader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putting it in the same units, it's:

 

Nero = ~1 GB

ImgBurn = ~0.0015 GB

 

(Where '~' means Approx)

 

The way you're saying things is a little confusing - I guess that's because English isn't your native language. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have almost completely abandoned Nero for other programs such as Imgburn and I'm not sorry at all...I think Imgburn is the best burning application available. It is feature rich and keeps getting better all the time. LUK puts a lot of hard work as do all the beta testers here to make it all the much better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't fired up Ner0 in over a year according to my Add Remove Progs control panel.

 

Will never update it (using 6.6.0.something).

 

Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Putting it in the same units, it's:

 

Nero = ~1 GB

ImgBurn = ~0.0015 GB

 

(Where '~' means Approx)

 

The way you're saying things is a little confusing - I guess that's because English isn't your native language. :)

 

Well somehow that's true, english is not my native language, anyway I writed this comparison in the intent to be confusing :innocent:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, ImgBURN just rocks.

 

It started for me with the idea that there must be something out there better than this shit (nero). especially after I updated the nero to 7.5.XXXX, It just sucks.

I tried every other program out there, Roxio, Power2Go, Instant CD/DVD NTI, you name it.

I didn't try ImgBurn until someone recommended it on the cdfreaks forum, I guess the program being free made me ignore it at first.

 

What really hooked me up, is the batch file idea for multiple burns in build mode, that saved TIIIMEEEEE.

 

When I tried it, I was as happy as the day I started using FireFox.

 

THANKS LUK!.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never used Nero for anything at home, Nero Express is installed at work but I still use ImgBurn there as well :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I removed Nero, Roxio and all the other bloated programs quite a while ago..I use ImgBurn for all file work and Burrrn for mp-3 etc. and life is good! :thumbup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wouldnt burn rags with nero!!

 

:whistling:

Edited by jack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.