Jump to content

dbminter

Beta Team Members
  • Posts

    8,641
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dbminter

  1. What are the contents of this disc? If it's not a bootable disc, i.e. just a disc of some contents that aren't made in any fancy way, you could try just creating a new ISO in ImgBurn Build mode. See if that ISO mounts. Of course, this doesn't solve why Windows won't mount that ISO. But, you could spend the rest of your life trying to debug a Windows issue and get nowhere. It's the nature of the Windows beast. When something goes wrong with an internal Windows function, too often than not, the only solution is to restore Windows from an image where it worked before/reinstall Windows. However, it's probably just a case of a weird ISO that isn't mounting correctly as you said another image does work. Probably something wrong/weird with the source disc that is creating a weird ISO.
  2. Yeah, you probably just had a random fluke where one worked. Even crap media will, on occasion, succeed every once in a while. If those discs don't work on both firmware revisions, the problem is either the drive or the discs. And Ritek is a 2nd tier disc manufacturer. And you should never go for Ritek for double layer media. Verbatim, pretty much, makes the only good DVD+R DL discs, so they probably make the only good BD DL media. I only use their BD-RE DL and sometimes TDK made Verbatim's BD-RE DL, which I've also used successfully. I recommend reflashing that drive back to 1.50. There was a bork in the firmware with 1.34 involving Ritek 8x DVD+RW discs not writing correctly, always failing Verify, that Pioneer fixed with 1.50. So, who knows what else they fixed? Of course, who knows what else they might have broke?! I wrote to Pioneer nearly 2 years ago about that DVD+RW issue, but never expected anymore firmware updates to the drive after almost 2 years. Color me surprised when it came out on the 2nd of March!
  3. If you're adventurous, you could try reverting the Pioneer firmware from 1.50 to 1.34 with DVRTool. See what I did here: http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?/topic/24254-random-trouble-with-bd-writeverify/ However, be aware that my experience with DVRTool works with the Pioneer BD-2209 drive. It may not work with your drive.
  4. Yes, under what context do you mean that BDMV folders will write? Are you writing them to ISO first and burning them or using the on the fly build? Or using some other program entirely to write these folders to discs?
  5. I encountered a similar problem. I got a 209 to supplement my 2209 from Pioneer. I put the 209 in my enclosure to test it before installing it internally, which was its target destination. I updated the firmware to 1.50 from 1.34. I tried burning a Verbatim BD-R SL, but at 70% into it, the write rate dropped to 0.0x and never resumed. The drive light was off but the enclosure light was flashing. Had to power off the enclosure and had a coaster. I tried a DVD+RW and the same thing happened at 97% into Verify. I installed the drive internally in case it might be the enclosure or a conflict with the enclosure and the 209. The 2209 was no problem back in January with this same enclosure. The drive works fine installed internally, it seems, so it must be either the enclosure or an incompatibility between the enclosure and the 209. This doesn't appear to be your problem because the screen shot seems to indicate your drive is installed as SATA, which is internally installed.
  6. Booting into Safe Mode would be my next troubleshooting suggestion, too. You can then see if it's something in your Windows installation that might be causing the problem. As LUK said, some kind of software interference, like antivirus. It could be the drive needs replacing. I'd also see about getting an enclosure and putting the drive in that and testing and see if you still get that or other errors. However, an enclosure isn't necessarily a viable idea. I put my new Pioneer 209 BD in one and was getting weird errors where Writes and Verifies would drop to 0.0x and never resume. So, I installed the drive internally, since that was always its intended target. It worked. So, either my enclosure has died after just 2 months or there's an incompatibility between the 209 and the enclosure. Swapping out the drive would also verify if the drive is the problem or some kind of software interference or a different hardware error. However, of course, any swapping out of drives for other drives or putting them in an enclosure requires work and sufficient knowledge in cracking open the PC case.
  7. Oh, wait, there was a log attached! My bad!
  8. I've been collecting all kinds of things that have been accruing over the past 26 years. I even still have my FORTRAN projects back when I was taught it in college. No one uses FORTRAN anymore, even back when I was taught it. And I haven't touched FORTRAN since 1995, but I've kept all the programs I wrote during college.
  9. ImgBurn will burn BDMV folders. What happens exactly when you try to burn BDMV folders? Do you get the same error? As to the nature of the error, I can see a few potential things. How old this drive? The Pioneer 208, I think, is a pretty old BD burner. The drive might have simply come to the end of its life cycle. I see you were using Ricoh media. Have you always used this Ricoh media before? It may be your drive doesn't like that particular Disc ID. Are you burning this ISO to DVD or BD media? Ricoh media can be pretty iffy for some drives. It's a generally lower tier quality media. If it's a DVD disc, try using Verbatim DataLife Plus media, which you can only find online. NOT the Life Media series you find in stores. If it's BD, try Verbatim BD if you haven't already. Unless it's BD-RE SL. Don't use Verbatim BD-RE SL. Try updating the firmware of this drive. Pioneer recently released the 1.50 branch of its current and older BD drives after more than a year of no updates. That might help. You should do it anyway even if it doesn't. In Write mode, right click on the drop down list of target drives and choose the option to Check for firmware updates. Post the entire log of this failed burn, not just the error screen that pops up. Help --> ImgBurn Logs
  10. I said abandoned because I haven't seen a THUMBS.DB file in a folder except for 10 year plus old backups of folders I did. Restoring them restored the THUMBS.DB that was backed up with the folders back with Windows Vista. I haven't seen a "live" THUMBS.DB file in any folder on any Windows installation I've had since Vista. Except for, as I said, deprecated contents. So, I just guessed it was abandoned. I looked it up. It seems that THUMBS.DB did make it all the way to Windows 8, but doesn't seem to be live anymore in Windows 10.
  11. Actually, firmware 1.50 might improve the results of your issue. I checked the release notes for 1.50. They say these improvements were made to the firmware: Improvement of the recording quality with BD-R TL(2x 4x 6x : MCM) Performance improvement during high-speed rotation Improvement of the operational stability when recording DVD-RAM That first line is of importance here. However, it seems to indicate MCM BD-R TL discs. However, MCM makes Verbatim's DVD-R and DVD+R DL. Don't know if they make Milleniata's Verbatim M-Disc BD-R TL or not. Though, it seems you'd have a higher possible success rate with BD-R TL under this 1.50 firmware. It's definitely something worth investigating if you wanted to invest the time and money.
  12. One thing I noticed Pioneer updated in this firmware also relates to 8x DVD+RW. In the past, writing initially began at 6x for the first 2 and half minutes. That time has been cut down to one minute and 15 seconds.
  13. As far as the 2209 goes, firmware updates make a lot of difference. For instance, when I first got the 2209, there were 2 Verbatim DVD+R DL media brands with the same Disc ID. One disc had an inkjet printable surface and one was branded. The 2209 had no problems with the branded discs, but would always fail Verify on the inkjet discs, even though they were the same DID. Internally, they should not have been different, but apparently, they were. The next firmware update to the 2209 fixed this issue. Then, when the 1.34 firmware came out, it caused Ritek 8x DVD+RW that would burn and Verify under 1.33 to fail Verifies until fully formatted in another drive. Hence why I started using the LG for my 8x DVD+RW. Then, the 1.50 firmware came out for the 2209 and 8x DVD+RW completes Verifies now. And now that my LG needs replacing and the 2209 appears to work again with 8x DVD+RW, I'm getting the Pioneer 209 BD that doesn't support BDXL and M-Disc since I don't need those. It has the same firmware revision number (In fact, the other, newer Ultra HD BD drive Pioneer put out also has the same firmware revision number.) as the 2209 does now, so it should write to 8x DVD+RW fine, too. I didn't know about the firmware update until today. I had checked a few weeks ago, but there wasn't one. Don't know what prompted me to check today, but I did, and there it was.
  14. Now, IF you wanted to gamble the money on it, you could try some more Verbatim BD-R X/TL M-Disc with this new Pioneer BDR-2209 1.50 firmware. See if this new firmware handles those kinds of media better. However, as I said, it's a gamble. But, if you had any left, why got give it a throw?
  15. Well, what do you know? After over a year of no new firmware updates, Pioneer updated the 1.34 firmware of the BDR-2209 to 1.50. I had thought that the 2209 would never receive another firmware update. I'm testing an 8x DVD+RW right now, in the Verify stage where it failed before, to see if they fixed the borked firmware from before. So, if the OP got the 2209 and has decided to keep it, there is a new 1.50 firmware released around March 2nd. It's dated December 2017, though, oddly enough. Surprisingly enough, the LG WH16NS40 also got a firmware update after like almost 4 years. But that was to plug a decryption hole in Ultra HD Blu-Ray's. Maybe that's why the 2209 got one, too. Simply to plug a Hollywood Hole, a goof that the big movie producers don't want. And nothing done to actually better the drive. And, the 1.50 firmware PASSED! They actually followed up on my e-mail and fixed the borked firmware, it seems!
  16. I only use double layer discs when necessary. For DVD-Video jobs that require DVD+R DL and for BD-RE DL to make my monthly system and files backups to. I avoid using multi-layer media whenever I can. Even though it takes more BD-R to do a backup than it would BD-R DL, they're more likely to finish without errors and not have a problem reading back later on in years.
  17. But, THUMBS.DB was abandoned after Windows Vista. The OP's original intention seemed to indicate he wasn't using that version of Windows. But, if you are using Vista, just do the steps as described above.
  18. Which makes sense. After all, I believe long file/folder names are actually still 8.3 names with ~ in them and desktop.ini may just link the long file name with the 8.3 name. For reference, here are two related posts I made about this topic where I encountered this same thing: http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?/topic/24759-imgburn-created-2-folders-in-the-same-directory-with-the-same-name/?hl=%2Btemporary+%2Bburn+%2Bfolder http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?/topic/24760-drag-and-drop-from-optical-renames-target-folder-as-temporary-burn-folder-on-fall-creators-update/?hl=%2Btemporary+%2Bburn+%2Bfolder&do=findComment&comment=160787
  19. As far as I know, what you suggested by about inserting the media and letting Windows generate the thumbnail data in the Users cache is probably the best and easiest way to go. I can't think of any way you could manually import that information with the switch over from THUMBS.DAT.
  20. I had this happen once or twice before. I couldn't explain it either. Somehow, on the disc I burned, TWO folders in the same sub-directory were named the same thing, Temporary Burn Folder. I didn't think that was even possible under Windows's file structure. My folders were also supposed to be named Disc 1 Of 2 and Disc 2 Of 2. I also burned to BD-R. It was reproducable for a while but after I rebooted, it stopped doing that.
  21. You're right. I just inferred the OP wanted to make an ISO of a bootable USB stick. However, the contents from the stick could be used to make a bootable recovery disc. I thought ImgBurn couldn't make an ISO of the stick, but I never thought about using its contents to Build an ISO until you pointed that out.
  22. But, that doesn't make an ISO of the USB stick, though, does it? It just creates a bootable ISO of the installation media you can burn to an optical disc, right? I never had, well, any luck creating bootable discs with ImgBurn's Build options. But, I was trying to recreate WinPE rescue media from Macrium Reflect, so I had no idea what necessary settings were required or if any files were needed beyond the boot sector ones.
  23. ImgBurn won't do this, I use USB Image Tool for such a task as the one you want to do. I think it saves to ISO, but I don't remember if that is the file output format or not.
  24. A disk imaging program copies sector by sector of a hard disk drive partition. For instance, if you just backed up the Windows files, you can't just restore all of them and expect Windows to start. You have to restore a disk image of the Windows partition in order to get Windows to start if you need to restore Windows. ImgBurn doesn't do that. Now, if they're non-important non-system files, you could always copy them with ImgBurn. It depends on what you want to do. If you want to copy a Windows installation disc, ImgBurn can do that. If you want to backup Windows, ImgBurn can backup the files, but it cannot backup the various boot sectors, etc. that Windows needs to start.
  25. Yeah, could have been, and seems to have been, the player. Depends on how old it is. Older age would play a factor. I had a Panasonic Blu-Ray player that after only 5 years, and about half of that it was never used, it started simply stopping playback in mid play of discs. And your player may have had a problem with Taiyo Yuden media. TY is generally pretty compliant, but not every player plays nice with all media. For instance, I had Memorex Ritek BD-R's that don't play back properly on my Playstation 3. Which was why I got the Panasonic at first before I discovered the PS3 has no problems with Verbatim BD media and just copied my Memorex BD's to Verbatim BD's.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.