dbminter

I've put this in Support because it's not a bug that I know of. I've not been able to reproduce it, but, I am posting what happened so that if anyone else encounters it, they can reply. Because, you never know. Strange behavior after a burn. When I clicked OK to the Operation Completed Successfully box, a dialog immediately opened up asking if I really wanted to Cancel. I selected No because I didn't and the box just closed. I've not had it return since that one time, so, my guess is it was just a one time fluke of some kind. The kind I am famous for in these forums.

Of course, King Bush II says he had no idea of this whole deal until after it was started. Two problems here: 1.) he is speaking true, and it shows that the man who claims it is his holy cause to keep America safe from terrorists doesn't even know a goddamn thing that is going on in his own administration 2.) worse, he is lying about it and doesn't give a damn about what really happens as long as some money goes somewhere.

And, finally, a real reason for the wine. Gives new meaning to the concept of eating of the body of your master.

Ah, yes... when Cash starting pouring out the cup of wine over the NIN cover, I knew he had lost his mind.

bill; I've worked hard to lose as much of my mind as I have at this point. Thank you. Now, it's all been worth it.

For I beheld the corny beast! And, now, you too, can behold images of the corny beast! BEHOLD! http://www.deviantart.com/view/6332659/ (If a blank image shows up, use Zoom Out. Yes, the man's name IS Dickman. )

Actually, I believe it's easy in England. Aren't all birds women because it's a slang term? BTW, on a serious note, supposedly, you can tell the sexes by things like colors, markings, physical size, calls, and shapes.

It seems like an idiotic way of doing it, though. Imagine what their letter of recommendation FROM this person would be like?

Yeah, I noticed that. Basically, you'd need to be at the keyboard to execute it as listed, but, my thinking was if it could be exploited thusly: the payload is designed to represent itself as a system update. It flags sethc.exe to be updated, initiates a call for restart, then, on restart, but, before Windows loads, the update of sethc.exe occurs with a copy of cmd.exe Then, a cmd instance is initiated minimized on start of Windows, with piped code sent to the prompt to add a new user or users. It would then be added at the current signed in level, which would be System according to what I read.

I'm more worried about the copying of the CMD.EXE to SETHC.EXE Even if you remove Accesibility Tools in Add/Remove, SETHC.EXE should remain because it is needed for Desktop Themes, I think.

This information is about a year old, so, is it still valid? Because a lot of what it says makes sense. http://forum.s-t-d.org/viewtopic.php?id=2116

BEHOLD! The face of the beast! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:IBM_536...ont.triddle.jpg Well, one of its many faces. I worked with two of these things, the System/36 and the AS-400. The System 36 was like 700 pounds and had belt driven hard drives! The funny thing was the AS-400, meant to replace the System/36, turned out to be more difficult to use because the old code had to be rewritten for the new system, instead of just copied over.

Try and wrap your brain around this one, because, it makes no sense, and, that's what the businesses and the judges want. Is it legal to copy a DVD you purchased and own, for your own backup purposes and use? For one copy, yes, US law makes that legally expressed. But, guess what? Anything that has to break CSS to do it IS illegal because it gets around a digital protection method, and this is covered as illegal because of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. So, the copies are legal, but, USING the tools to make the copies aren't! Thus, you can have 10,000 pirated DVD's made by someone else, but, what's illegal is certain applications made them. BUT how can you tell? The copies aren't illegal, making the copies is not illegal, but, using the tools that make the copies of CSS protected discs (Or any future protections.) are illegal. Now, here's the funny part... it is therefore, according to this legal wrangling, apparently possible to do this: use a tool to make a copy of a protected disc you own, so that the copy has no protection on it, then copy the non-protected CSS disc again with a program that will not copy protected discs, such as Nero Burning ROM, just make a 1:1 copy, and burn that copy. Then, totally remove the decryption tool from your PC. Because the copies in this case aren't illegal, because the copying in this case is not illegal, only using the decrypting tool is illegal, they can't prove you used anything that gets around the DMCA. What this means in the end is a total goddamn mess! No one knows a thing about what is legal and what isn't. Because creating a decryption tool is not illegal. Possessing a decryption tool is not illegal. Merely using it is. But, you have to use to get around the protection on discs you own. The real challenge is going to be someday if someone could be used with "proof" of use of a decryption tool on a copy with the use of Implementation ID's and the like. The problem there is a person could just clam up and say they have no idea what an application might add to any such fields. Or that they have no idea of anything! In the end, there is no real legal or illegal definition of what you can do with what you own. Thus, the studios are using the ambiguity as a strong arm to push around the public and convince judges to agree with them by the mere word of the law to get around the intent of the law. All to control the selling scheme of where, how, and when people can buy DVD's. Because, as Jack Valenti openly said once, if people want a backup copy, just buy a 2nd damn DVD. And that's what the studios want, a license to steal via double dipping.

What? Banging on his door?

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Yeah, right! You're so transparent! YOU did this to me! I KNOW IT!

We have risen!

Well, who's to say that it isn't? Renamed to something else, run in the background with switches...

Okay, now, THIS wasn't funny! Got this piece of fishing, I guess, to try and get my information. i.e. one of the links goes to something that isn't a part of eBay. It says a bid I entered was cancelled. Which is strange as I've not bid on anything at all this year! So, I went by eBay proper and searched by the claimed cancelled item number. This is NOT funny, people! Whoever did it, fess up! http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...%3D50%26fvi%3D1

There's... wow... I don't even know if I can go on with it... there's... Hell, see for yourself! http://www.gccwired.com/defaultFlashStory.asp?storyid=434 Apparently, this church is desperate enough to get people to... come... in by telling them how to have better sex! What I want to know is... what the HELL must Communion be like! IF their church is hands on... I live pretty near the place. This church has but one commandment: be fruitful and multiply! With a heavy dose of Onan and his spilled seed upon the ground. You know what? This is a swiped idea! There's already a religion that draws people in with sex. They're called wicca! Apparently, this church stole the idea because it saw a good thing going in something else.

It's all I ever use. IMO, there's really no difference between them except for a few things: 1.) DVD+R is a little bit more expensive 2.) DVD+R is newer 3.) DVD+R is hyped more. And, even without facotirng in having tested them in the wild, all those things spell one thing: trying to make a silk purse of a sow's ear. My prime reason, though, is my tests with DVD+R had a problem in that any dual format burner that burned DVD+R would not play in the Panasonic stand alone DVD recorder. And, the future has proven me well. DVD+ tends to get the faster write rates, etc. first, but, they tend to be tremendously error prone. DVD-R tends to take longer before they release things like this, but, generally (It's never perfect.) they require fewer revisions to fix the bugs. So, it's really just a marginal thing: that, in the end, I choose DVD-R because it's cheaper, and the extra spent for DVD+R isn't worth it. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Of course, I also remember backing Beta because it was better. Doesn't mean it will win, though.

Thursday's "amazing" deal at Office Depot: $30 off a purchase of 100 DVD-R's. Off of MEMOREX. The center isle had maybe 20 of these stacks, unsold. And, no wonder! Garbage in, garbage out.

And, naturally, after I post, yet another job offer in the area for expertise with that bloody iSeries!

I had to laugh when I saw this bundle advertised and demonstrated on ShopAtHome! For $199, they send you a Sony External DVD burner, no model listed, 50 HP DVD+R discs, and ICopyDVD's2 software. First, they showed a "Hollywood produced DVD" with numerous fingerprints on the data surface. Oh no! It must be repaired! BUT, the funny part? When the guy inserts the DVD in the drive for reading... it has a silver matte top! Hollywood produced? Yeah! Right! It's Then, this guy fires up ICopyDVD's2 and points out the screen that warns you against copying copyrighted movies. And he actually says, "Now, the software cannot tell the difference between copyrighted DVD's and those that aren't!" While he doesn't know it he openly admits that the software has a ripper in it, even if it doesn't. He's not going to know, because, he doesn't know the different between copyrighted DVD's and content protected DVD's! Most DVD's are content protected, but, not all are copyrighted. e.g. silent movies made in the 1920's and earlier have long since fallen out of copyright but may still be protected from copying. They usually aren't, because the company doesn't want to pay the licensing fee to whoever owns CSS to protect something that isn't copyrighted. e.g. public domain means that anyone can get a piece of the pie, so, the cost of protecting the disc from copying utilities with measures that always fail is more than the cost of the few people who would copy such material as it is a niche market to begin with. This next part, though, was what made me laugh out loud! This amazing "Hollywood produced DVD" was read in from the drive in a miraculous time of under 1 minute and 30 seconds! e.g. this disc was just a dummy disc created with less than a 1 GB of data, probably. Anyway, the copy burns... well, it starts to burn because, interestingly enough, you never actually SEE the burn finish nor the guy demonstrating the whole thing ever insert the new disc into any player and show that it copied. But, he did kindly point out some friendly advice: to use the bundle to make copies of your purchased Hollywood produced DVD's! That he does it all the time, so the kids can damage the copies, and he still has the new versions he bought. Yet, will the M AA go after ShopAtHome for SELLING something that not only can, in theory, copy DVD's BUT that the network FREELY recommends you do?

Let's try it again... An IBM minicomputer.