Ch3vr0n

I checked out the domain, according to the whois records the domain didn't just expire (causing it to go into quarantine), it's point blank entirely inactive. Domain is offline completely, not linked to a server or hosting. There's only 1 DNS record left (a SOA one, not enough for an active domain) DNS Records for btrack.club Hostname Type TTL Priority Content btrack.club SOA 59 ns1.dns.nic.club hostmaster@neustar.biz 1598694981 900 900 604800 60 Neustar.biz did some dealing with them. But I urge you to (if you can), skip PayPal entirely. The chances of getting a refund that way are close to none. Do a chargeback NOW, it'll hurt them right where they don't want it. A successful chargeback not only restores your spent funds, it costs EXTRA on top of the refund for the party that's getting the chargeback. Too many of those can severely cripple one's reputation with payment service providers. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

My guess, need on the current image, would be the crappy ritek blanks that area being used Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Maybe nothing unusual TO YOU, but until you post the log. Nobody here will know or be able to help you Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Nobody knows unless you post the burn log Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

This isn't a fake website with a fake product. Nobody's forcing you to come (back) here or use it or the website. Feel free to leave, don't let the door hit you on the way out. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Ugh ritek crap, yeah that'll probably do it. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Because those mirrors often wrap the actual installer in their own installer or downloader for the installer, causing the checksum to no longer match. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Hey maybe with the corona quarantine you can polish the code a little and release it. Say, in a week? Would sure sir these guys up with 'this thing is dead', and it would sure make us non-whiners happy [emoji28] Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

@awkj the creator (lightning UK) hasn't come up with this beta just now, that's the whole point of these past few points. It's that random member that came up with that 'release', hell 2 can play that game. This isn't directed at you [emoji6] I can knock up 2.6.0.0 on about 5 seconds of I wanted too. Fire up 2.5.8.0, copy the first few lines from the log generated, paste them here in the reply box and change the version number and windows info. Done, a magical non-existing 2.6.0.0 just appeared out of thin air. While 8 years is indeed a very long time, as long as there's support, a product isn't dead. Now if support were to end too, that would change things a bit, but even then as long as it would still work I wouldn't be looking for replacement software. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Beta 1, I'll believe that when I see it. Can't find a link. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

That's not an imgburn problem. That's a VM/ISO problem Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

No they haven't L. Even a flash drive that contains both x86 and x64 setups doesn't even fill up an 8gb flash drive. A single layer iso is just over 4gb for me for 2004. I'd have to check the exact numbers Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

The RW logo is from the DVD standard' a DVD+R DL as you say it is is NOT rewritable. It's single use only. On top of that imgburn ALWAYS closes a disc. It doesn't support multi-session. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

VLC is outstanding in it's primary task. A video player for just about any video file/codec you throw at it. But it ends there. While it can perform DVD/Blu-ray player, it's no match for players that are designed and licensed for it like powerdvd (which on turn is then just horrible for basic video file playback). Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Perhaps, but as it stands now at this very moment that scenario does NOT apply to Win 10 build 2004. Just burned another 3 Blu-ray with it. 100% fully functional. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Those drives do work with imgburn as source (eg to make an issue of a disc), they'll show up there. But not as a target when you try to both a DVD. It will show up for do l burning a CD. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Dvd-rom? No chance. Since imgburn is a burn tool, read only drives don't even get listed for use as a target drive to do the burning Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

No imgburn log, we can't help you. But if imgburn says it's not empty, it's not empty. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Nope, the last time you used an o instead of a 0 (zero) :-P Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Did someone call my name? And yes I'm the same user over at the VSO forums too Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

The first image CLEARLY states it's an advertisement. Those are known to wrap the actual installer on their own crap. Use mirror 7 and don't be 'next next next' click happy. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

What does any of that have to do with imgburn? Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

write speed is exactly that. It only affects how fast the drive burns something resulting in potentially better or worse burn. It again has zero effect on an audio track for example carying audio or not.

Imgburn only burns what you tell it to. It has zero effect on actual playback behavior Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Most likely because that type of recorders still add AACS encryption themselves. As with any BD you CAN copy over the files fine without any extra tool, but they're still encrypted. The same applies to standalone bd recorders, it's still encrypted and needs to be decrypted Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk