File size comparision

[Wandering Freeloader]

Just for comparison

 

Nero 8 weight less than 1 GB (of course there is a lot of almost useless software maybe bloatware/crapware)

ImgBurn, well it weight more than 1 500 000 Bytes (and there is only the burning software)

 

Which one suits best your needs...

 

I'm sure every one had made the correct choice, isn't it?

[dontasciime]

You trying to say Nero is smaller than ImgBurn ? Surely that cannot be what you saying (you mean the other way round) yeah.

 

 

I made the right choice in using ImgBurn rather than Nero

[Wandering Freeloader]

Yeah ImgBurn just rocks

 

But I was astonished when I saw the installation size of Nero 8, of course i dnd't want it . I felt a fair comparison was needed. Anyway I completely assume my words there

Edited September 11, 2007 by Wandering Freeloader

[LIGHTNING UK!]

Putting it in the same units, it's:

 

Nero = ~1 GB

ImgBurn = ~0.0015 GB

 

(Where '~' means Approx)

 

The way you're saying things is a little confusing - I guess that's because English isn't your native language.

[LOCOENG]

I have almost completely abandoned Nero for other programs such as Imgburn and I'm not sorry at all...I think Imgburn is the best burning application available. It is feature rich and keeps getting better all the time. LUK puts a lot of hard work as do all the beta testers here to make it all the much better.

[blutach]

Haven't fired up Ner0 in over a year according to my Add Remove Progs control panel.

 

Will never update it (using 6.6.0.something).

 

Regards

[Altercuno]

Nero fiddles while it tries to burn...

[Wandering Freeloader]

Putting it in the same units, it's:

 

Nero = ~1 GB

ImgBurn = ~0.0015 GB

 

(Where '~' means Approx)

 

The way you're saying things is a little confusing - I guess that's because English isn't your native language.

 

Well somehow that's true, english is not my native language, anyway I writed this comparison in the intent to be confusing

[DarK HawK]

Well, ImgBURN just rocks.

 

It started for me with the idea that there must be something out there better than this shit (nero). especially after I updated the nero to 7.5.XXXX, It just sucks.

I tried every other program out there, Roxio, Power2Go, Instant CD/DVD NTI, you name it.

I didn't try ImgBurn until someone recommended it on the cdfreaks forum, I guess the program being free made me ignore it at first.

 

What really hooked me up, is the batch file idea for multiple burns in build mode, that saved TIIIMEEEEE.

 

When I tried it, I was as happy as the day I started using FireFox.

 

THANKS LUK!.

[lfcrule1972]

I have never used Nero for anything at home, Nero Express is installed at work but I still use ImgBurn there as well

[spinningwheel]

I removed Nero, Roxio and all the other bloated programs quite a while ago..I use ImgBurn for all file work and Burrrn for mp-3 etc. and life is good!

[cornholio7]

imgburn and wmp covers my burning needs

[jack]

I wouldnt burn rags with nero!!

 

Edited September 14, 2007 by jack