dontasciime

you could expect this from it, only 1760 meg as partitioned at minute. linear bufferred access edit other server was off.

yep shamus point is best, lock down the mac address as well as set up wep eg you supply hex 10 digit key for her router and match the same key in operating system. Do not get router to generate key for you add one manually. enable firewall in router, also set up any other security features like, Block Anonymous Internet Requests , disable remote management.

goto mode then choose build mode. Then select output image file Then either select a folder (browse for folder) that has the avi files in or select the individual avi files (browse for file) Then choose destination, then click on the folder 2 iso icon at bottom. Or if you want it to burn straight to disc choose output to device

you gotta be kidding

Yup

answered in other topic LOL http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Storag...?ProductID=2180 all 4 gig is hard drive, you gotta have a Sata mobo though

http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Storag...?ProductID=2180 thought you had posted this in wrong topic

Touch it.

I'm using my 4 gig as ram hard drive. You got the board yet for ya e6700. I decided on msi 975x platinum power up edition one, It's OK but has very bad bios which is taking msi forever to sort out. I think the bios issue is also plaguing other manufacturers as well though. [edit] actually read ya post wrong i saw it as intel 975xxx when you meant you bought the badaxe.

Like I said I cannot rule out my mistake of maybe having another instance of it running at same time.

Mine has done this once so far with latest version. I do not know if it was something i did, eg I already had an instance of imgburn still open on toolbar, i know nothing else should have had priority at that point. I never use packet writing crap, Will take more notice next time and see if i can get it to do it again. I have never had that error on any of my computers or writers, It might be down to my Liteon drive.

yep, i knew about the 4 core b4 i bought mine, as coolaler had been testing it, he gets all the best gear to test. Old before you know it, thats always the way it has been and will always be so. I have to say i am over the moon with my E6600, best CPU i have ever bought. Will still keep an eye on AMD though. I think they have their work cut out as the core 2 duo is fantastic CPU and if AMD had something to compete there back to the drawing board when kentsfield appears in Jan 2007 or whenever it gets released.

Excellent, thanks for the invite but what's everyone else gonna drink.

Where's the ******* cake ?

or http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/.../22/218527.aspx did try and edit above post but got 403

http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/.../14/699521.aspx

i think he said cloud prohosting does not allow external linking

It's on my christmas list (2008)

Thats what we in england pay for a piece of wood.

you try corsair xms ?

you must be overclocking ya 3000 to get 2.5 ghz its only rated @ 1800 mhz I like my amd chips as well, but was willing to sample something else as amd chips have gone a bit stale for me, keep buying them ie the next model up and don't get to see much difference, and would never buy the FX range as just too dear, have been tempted though, like buying my limited edition dolce & gabanna motorola V3i for over ?1,000 and its a gimmick and regretted buying it after the rush wore off. edit changed any to much.

I got my E6600 and board msi 975x platinum powerup edition. Windows xpprosp2 installed in 6 minutes 30 seconds. Will be seeing how encoding and some other tasks perform against my athlon 64's . Don't think much of my athlon AM2 cpu on asus m2n32 sli deluxe Now where's my petrol

Has anyone on here got one of these boards and using 2x1 gig matched corsair xms2 memory, if so, in bios what does it say under installed memory and usable memory. Mine says installed, 2048 (using 2 gig)usable 2047, using 1 gig says installed 1024, usable 1023, in any slot, and the other gig stick says same in any slot Memtest86+ says 1023 with 1 gig in and 2047 with both. does not give any errors testing all sticks sep or all together. Thing is though this TWIN2XP2048-6400C4, has parametric LED , memory usage led levels, which are not working at all, i have some xms 3200 ddr1 400 memory with same LEDs , so i know what they should be doing, also the program to go with the xms2 says no xpert memory modules detected, everest, sandra detect them no bother. would seem to indicate board, yet its running stable as hell.

Intel have now made everything they made b4 core 2 duo worthless. My decision to buy Intel was based on nothing Intel told me. Results from independent reviews, swayed me me,*showing me the ?225 e6600 was every bit as good infact better then the dearer FX62 I may live to regret my purchase as truely i am an AMD Fan but from everything i have read on performance Tests by non intel staff says im gonna love it. However I will know for sure next week once i build up what i bought. edited at about 9.11 pm to add a 2 between core and duo and a typo should have been E6600

This normally ends in fighting but here i go anyways. I have always bought Amd, as imo i believe they run better at what i want to do. I was all set to replace my new(unused but socketed AM2 Athlon 64 3800+ with an dual core socket AM2 x2 4800+ (winchester) 2mb L2 cache when company i had just bought it off informed me that the email they had sent me earlier in the morning, telling me they were back in stock was a mistake and they could not source them. When i remembered that Intel,s Core 2 Duo was either just about to be in shops or was already there. So i went looking, in the past i have seen Intel chips come and go and all said they were better at this , that and in particular better than AMD,d chips, this i found to be untrue, every review i saw pitted the Intel as an inferior performer, benchmarks, my findings and benchmarks, just added to my opinion, which was that i am glad i bought AMD as Intel for all its clock speed could not keep up with my athlon 64 chips etc. So anyway i had read a while ago about these new Intel chips and from what the reviewers had posted about their findings on these CPU's i was tempted and yesterday i decided to order one and a new board. Has anyone on here got one and what do you think of it. Price wise AMD FX 62 is ?540.01 and that price has dropped from ?700+ The Intel core 2 duo i choose which would seem to be best value all round etc (overclock) the E6600 ?225 This chip seems to hammer the hammer(aka AMD'S best) The architecture of Intel's new chip range is fascinating, no integrated memory controller like AMD'S 64 athlon range and other things which would seem to make the AMD chips a better choice, until you read this http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2748 and this http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=2795&p=1 I am quite excited to get hold of something that seems to be on paper the start of another war between giants. This argument is like NVIDIA V's ATI and generally ends up in name calling. On the subject of NVIDIA v ATI, Nvidias take over of ALI/ULI was a smart move, AMD's take over of ATI was also very smart. Nvidias take over of uli/ali was a spite move, Saying as how ATI's branching into the motherboard market like nvidia had done before it did not go smoothly, with issues with bottlenecking using crossfire chipset, usb2 was poor. ATI went to ALI/ULI to fix (Nvidia said not going to happen now co's we bought out ALI/ULI) IMO AMD has done the same with ATI, as INTEL have some agreement with ATI, well they did i suspect, until AMD took over ATI.