chewy

thanks luk, I might rescan, I left the disk in the drive for all three scans but did upgrade the program after the second scan btw this swisstech(sky) media isn't that bad, hopefully a good sign for media from europe

3 scans all showed the high pif max, which only showed at the very end, pulled a 96 until then. cdspeed same disk ]My Webpage[/url] transfer test smooth as glass

]My Webpage[/url]I 07:18:37 ImgBurn Version 1.3.0.0 started! I 07:18:37 Microsoft Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600 : Service Pack 2) I 07:18:37 Initialising SPTI... I 07:18:37 Searching for SCSI / ATAPI devices... I 07:18:37 Found 2 DVD?RWs! I 07:24:10 Operation Started! I 07:24:10 Source File: -==/\/[DISCOVERY IMAGE]\/\==- I 07:24:10 Source File Sectors: 2,295,104 (MODE1/2048) I 07:24:10 Source File Size: 4,700,372,992 bytes I 07:24:10 Source File Volume Identifier: DISCOVERY_IMAGE I 07:24:10 Destination Device: [0:0:0] BENQ DVD DD DW1650 BCFC (F:) (ATA) I 07:24:10 Destination Media Type: DVD+R (Disc ID: Plasmon1-C01-00) (Speeds: 2.4x, 4x, 8x) I 07:24:10 Destination Media Sectors: 2,295,104 I 07:24:10 Write Mode: DVD I 07:24:10 Write Type: DAO I 07:24:10 Write Speed: 8x I 07:24:10 Link Size: Auto I 07:24:10 Test Mode: No I 07:24:10 BURN-Proof: Enabled I 07:24:10 Filling Buffer... I 07:24:10 Writing LeadIn... I 07:24:29 Writing Image... I 07:32:13 Synchronising Cache... I 07:32:14 Closing Track... I 07:32:17 Finalising Disc... I 07:33:18 Exporting Graph Data... I 07:33:18 Graph Data File: C:\Documents and Settings\BoB\Desktop\imgburn\BENQ_DVD_DD_DW1650_BCFC.ibg I 07:33:18 Export Successfully Completed! I 07:33:18 Operation Successfully Completed! - Duration: 00:09:08 I 07:33:18 Average Write Rate: 9,914 KB/s (7.2x) - Maximum Write Rate: 11,109 KB/s (8.0x) I 07:33:32 Close Request Acknowledged I 07:33:32 Closing Down... I 07:33:32 Shutting down SPTI... I 07:33:32 ImgBurn closed! ]My Webpage[/url]

I am attempting to duplicate a media burn test with discovery mode and imgburn and dvdinfo, I have found an anomaly, after three scans I keep getting an invisible peak in PIF at the very edge of the disk, transfer test and scan with cdspeed do not confirm. Has anyone else ever experienced such behavior.

you are graphing both read errors and burn errors, the goal is to set a slow enough scan speed to minimize the read errors, not an exact science at all, just an attempt at it repeat the pioneer scan at a much slower speed and see if you obtain different results

durn, the pigs will starve

works for dvd's also

jitter went all to hell on the T02 burn, the same place PIE's went off the chart, I suspect extraterrestrial influence or circles in the corn field

awfully hard getting the four windows tiled right tho

what's the source for the T02's brand name?

http://codeguys.rpc1.org/oc.html method 2? http://codeguys.rpc1.org/firmwares.html#SOHW-832S

http://forum.rpc1.org/dl_firmware.php?download_id=2034 too many models were called 640c I would crossflash to benq myself so I could scan

also at maximum read speed in a scan are you graphing burn errors or read errors?

and/or hardware issues like old worn out burners, trying to rebuild my first nec 3520 after getting it back from my son. damn thing has 270 PIF clumps at 4.2 gigs

customized start menu(rightclicktaskbar) ADVANCED

something's obviously wrong, where's the 8x burn speed? firmware should have been the first order of business

I would say by 1000%

sharp as a tack you are

Construction of New Factory Wing in That?s Fukushima Co., Ltd. to Increase Monthly Production Capacity of DVD-R & DVD+R Media Taiyo Yuden is building a new factory wing at That?s Fukushima Co., Ltd., a subsidiary involved in the production of recordable media (due to commence operations in October 2004). With the new wing, we will double the monthly production capacity of DVD-R and DVD+R media to 40 million disks by the end of this term. We will also improve the productivity of CD-R and increase monthly production to 70 million disks, partly by replacing the existing equipment with state-of-the-art models. Taiyo Yuden?s optical media are de facto standards and second to none in terms of quality, and we will provide customers with them based on greater supply capabilities. value packaging and marketing maybe but I have as yet to see any quality difference

Assuming the data on the archival dvd's is important, playability is not my prime concern. Will it rip back to the hard drive in most readers at full speed? Or in my case, copy on the fly at 8x? This standard is very practical and scanning is a valuable tool. A hypothetical example, idiot brother in law or step son comes for extended visit wanting to access your database.

I wonder what scanning at 4x or 8x would yield? The bad burn was possibly caused by multitasking or possibly wasn't bad, just the verify failed for the same reason?

bad media spread over the whole disk and pie/f's increasing where the 14-16x speeds would hit.

sure looked like a 12 or 16x burn, sorry, my memorex G05's were pretty inconsistent, most scanned 0 after a year or two, one or two still scan low 90's. http://www.shop4tech.com/user.htm?go=view_...&cata=1&s_cata= CS10 coupon code qs 99 disks

reburn at 8x and scan, memorex wouldn't spec the best quality, might even be from a different plant

will this be on the fly or a seperate operation?