chewy

look at the results for all the better media codes in all those tests, if the plex 716 can't beat the rest, why do you think the new one will?

"helping himself to another ear of corn from the steaming bowl."

there's a time limit that has expired(6 months or so) WPA In otherwords chewy your saying I can register this copy on a different PC every six months? Gonna have to say "I don't think thats true" google it, I have a lot, several MSMVPs wrote extensively on it. Long reads tho. Believe what you want. I usually go with official sources(MSMVP)

rebranded with double rebranded firmware http://forum.rpc1.org/dl_firmware.php?download_id=2113

there's a time limit that has expired(6 months or so) WPA

DVD+R9 supported media types: 20 ------------------------------------------ CMC MAG D01-000 2.4x CMC MAG D02-000 8x,6x,4x,2.4x CMC MAG D04-000 8x,6x,4x,2.4x FUJIFILM FR1-000 8x,6x,4x,2.4x INFOME D01-000 2.4x KIC00000 D20-000 2.4x MKM 001-000 2.4x MKM 001-000 8x,6x,4x,2.4x MKM 003-000 2.4x MKM 003-000 8x,6x,4x,2.4x PHILIPS CD2-000 2.4x PHILIPS PD2-000 2.4x PRODISC D01-000 2.4x RICOHJPN D00-001 2.4x RICOHJPN D01-002 8x,6x,4x,2.4x RITEK D01-001 2.4x RITEK D03-001 8x,6x,4x,2.4x RITEK S04-001 8x,6x,4x,2.4x RITEK X01-001 2.4x RITEK X08-001 8x,6x,4x,2.4x

No, don't waste another, but what led you to say that about the file size?

looking back over the scans, it seems an issue more with the nec 4550/1 drives than any media inconsistency for file size burn, except for the overspeed with the nec 3500.

other than the expected slope in the PIE's and a bad clump in the middle of the PIF's, I don't see any change from 4400 to a full disk ]My Webpage[/url]

now what would that have to do with the price of tea in china?

where in the heck are they coming from? Mine are much more consistent

In dos mode(pio)/ it doesn't matter what cpu, writing zeros/a low level format is dependent upon the size of the hard drive. Haven't done one of those in about 4-5 years. I did recover some drives with errors on them then and returned to factory certified condition. After using zap and wipe I never did a low level format again.

that's a low jitter 99, and a good batch of TYG02's here's the burn I am chasing ]My Webpage[/url]

and a crosscheck with cdspeed ]My Webpage[/url]

scanned in the benq ]My Webpage[/url]

that near perfct burn ]My Webpage[/url]

Cynthia got a Nec4551A. #39;( to scan with and establish a baseline of sorts

and http://forum.rpc1.org/dl_firmware.php?download_id=1827 dona(old) but a lot newer than doja

I think Cynthia needs a Benq.

and a certain version of binflasher has been pulled, now that's a hairy crossflash, and chewy deleted his, hmmmmmm, seems like I had someone use that a while back 1.24

some evidently succeded in crossflashing an nec 3550 over to an nec 4551,

2U3 and 2U4 are both based on the factory 3.06, my drive went downhill with both, Dee reccomended I go back, michealdeboer said 2U2 is based on 3.05

http://www.videohelp.com/dvdmedia.php?sele...a=1938#comments

what's this?

I 00:01:30 Source File Size: 6,359,121,920 bytes awful big file for a 4,600,000,00 byte disk I 00:01:30 Destination Media Type: DVD-R (Disc ID: TYG02) (Speeds: 4x, 6x, 8x) good single layer media(-R) I 00:01:30 Write Speed: 2.4x a +R media burn speed still doesn't add up, maybe too new a drive