chewy

I tested a lot of TYG02's with my benq 1620 and never got consistently better burns at 12x than at 8x, might have just had a very good disk when you tried 12x

my last batch(200) of value line TYG02 GG000077(no dbl stmp) came wrapped in a new plastic, and top white generic cover they are definitely lower quality out of newer production runs, still very good media but usually 200-300 and up PIF total

try and burn 4x media at 8x and get consistent pif totals less than 50 the word value applies but not seconds bulk pack is the operative term and quality is not what it used to be stuff was probably made way over a year ago

http://club.cdfreaks.com/showpost.php?p=1388717&postcount=29 poor guy ordered 24cent blanks, everyone else is getting TYG02's some 03's. they send him the old stuff, PIF total 34 ]My Webpage[/url]

http://forum.digital-digest.com/showthread.php?t=65230

I have been using the chinese firmware for over a week can't read the chinese subtitles tho

they seem to have found the trick over at cdfreaks, way over my head tho just like getting usb2 to do over 15x? I can only get 12 MB/s myself

cheap raid card flashed with non raid(hacked?) ide bios of course I prefer a case that doesn't require a furniture dolly to move

and I thought corn and I did some wild stuff some guy from nippon http://dvd-r.jpn.org/mdb/index3.html

http://forum.rpc1.org/dl_firmware.php?download_id=1904 there's a 2.88 firmware even it's dated 11/10/2004, but there is an excel file with supported media I'd stick with good 8x single layer media might be worth a go with a drive conversion and the newest firmware? http://liggydee.cdfreaks.com/page/3500/

here's a datadisk nec 3550 @ 16x yuden T02(8x media) dvd+r sony brand quite informative about the lousy nec error correction ]My Webpage[/url] ]My Webpage[/url]

the nec's show it more exaggerated than the benq's

lightning, one of the theories said it's related to relinking, but your graphs don't confirm, another reference said empty blocks in the data? Have you tried scanning one of those spikes in a liteon or plex? The benq's have a tendency to exaggerate(not good or bad) certain flaws in burns.

so far my benq 1650 doesn't seem to overspeed any burn, very conservative firmware

http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?showtop...t=0entry13338 with the nec >8x burns and scans by benq you see a lot of screwy results, even the 4571, QR of 89% but POF total of 1030 4551 an enormous spike at 2.5 gigs these spikes tend to not be reported in liteon and plex scans read a few theories, nothing concrete

http://club.cdfreaks.com/showpost.php?p=1374564&postcount=33 http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=175852 flashed my 1650 a week ago

it's always nicer to not have to crossflash(challenge or not)

life/mill? on the other side of the pond, oem/bulk came with G firmware. We got B firmware on our oem's from newegg. The only difference was firmware and software AFAIK, B firmware scans, G does not! Q suite software works with B firmware, maybe benq will give up this schitzy foolishness?

what's the firmware on the benq?

the phillips media I wonder if a liteon would confirm the spike or minimize it?

try to scan with a non benq drive and see what happens to those relinking spikes

what's the verdict on this new drive? Arrived stateside

my benq 1650 seems to like pioneer burns, even 3 year old ones on princo media my nec 3550 hates them! http://forum.digital-digest.com/showthread.php?t=64580

slow boat from china Out Of Stock ETA: 2006-04-25 18:32:00

http://www.de.nec.de/softwareoverview2.php/id/1325