spinningwheel

Sorry, this is not an ImgBurn issue so I would advise you to read the guides at the DVDFlick website or use Google to find out how to use it.

No, ImgBurn does not do multisession discs or leave discs open.

Just an FYI, we do not support older versions of ImgBurn so if you run into trouble update before posting a question.

Welcome to the forum. Great first post. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all.

Doesn't look much like Verbs from the MID... Either you are using some rea;;y cheap Verbatim or you bought fakes. Read this about discs: http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?showtopic=8000

Your source image is incorrectly made. We do not discuss ripping on this forum, however you can learn what you need to by checking Google.

Is it a Disney movie?

Read this, it applies to single layer as well as double layer media. http://forum.imgburn.com/index.php?showtopic=8000

Time for a new drive.

Thanks for the heads up.

The 'MID' is the manufacturers identification. Discs are often rebadged to show a commercial name on the disc packaging/individual discs by whomever bought them from the manufacturer. ImgBurn reads the actual info and presents it as the "MID". CMC is a disc manufacturer and you can find out more about their lack of quality by using the search function here in the forums. OOPS...the Boss already answered....

1. Formatting your pc 2x for an error caused by poor discs is total overkill. 2. Post the entire log from the failed burn and not just a screenshot.

What does this B.S.have to do with ImgBurn?

I can't answer the programming questions, but I'll take a stab at the really simple ones: EASY... ...Nice try...

http://www.imgburn.com/

Adrianvdh; I don't think it's so much you waiting for an automatic rejection as it is you suggesting changes that do not benefit the idea of ImgBurn. Making cosmetic changes because of one persons suggestion is not what happens around here. ImgBurn is as good as it can be because of its' design as well as the programming that the Boss does. Bloating it to make it look like FileZilla or any other program does nothing for the functionality of the program and just creates more areas for error or conflict within the program. LUK makes changes almost constantly to the program when there is a problem, but there is no need that I can see for making cosmetic changes just to please a couple users when there are millions of users that like the program just fine. I would suggest to you that if you find a bug within ImgBurn you report it with whatever suggestions you can figure out that will help correct the problem. I would also suggest that all of your cosmetic change suggestions are only going to frustrate you when they are not answered or implemented and they take away any serious consideration that a good suggestion made by you may have. For what it's worth; Spinner

ImgBurn 2.5.8.0 is out now.

Why bother?

If it's not answered...it ain't gonna happen.

So my conclusion is that it might be a bad batch/spindle(is that posible?)

A hidden feature? Yup, if you are from Baltimore and this is your first post

Nice first post and welcome to the forum.